Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

f.apache.org> Subject: Re: More entropy on bundle startup. Try the load-test command inside the karaf console. It randomly starts / stop / refresh bundles with multiple threads in loop, so such things are quickly seen usually. 2016-07-13 22:56 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies <ben...@basistech.

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

Try the load-test command inside the karaf console. It randomly starts / stop / refresh bundles with multiple threads in loop, so such things are quickly seen usually. 2016-07-13 22:56 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies : > Folks, > > We've had a couple of incidents of latent

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

We use DS for most of our services, but we have a few down at the activator level. I appreciate that the fixes to the bugs involve service tracking. The problem is _finding_ the bugs. Yes we use featuresBoot. featuresBootAsynchronous=false On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:56 AM, James Carman

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

You are using featuresBoot? Do you have featuresBootAsynchronous=false in your org.apache.karaf.features.cfg file? On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:33 AM Benson Margulies wrote: > I don't think so, no. I do not do any dynamic installation. I use the > Maven plugin to make an

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

What kind of services do you create? Blueprint, Component, direct Activator? I use Component, and the Component waits for the required components to be available and then starts. I have had issues in the past with badly coded direct Activators not starting in the correct order. I then

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

I don't think so, no. I do not do any dynamic installation. I use the Maven plugin to make an assembly with all the features I need. I then observe that the startup order is not deterministic from machine to machine, and it is particularly prone to change when I stop and start the container

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

Hi Benson, I guess you are using the deploy folder, so the fileinstall deployer, right ? Regards JB On 07/13/2016 10:56 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Folks, We've had a couple of incidents of latent problems stemming from invalid assumptions on bundle start order. Everything seems to be

Re: More entropy on bundle startup.

I love this idea! We’ve been fighting the same issues as well. -Nick On 7/13/16, 4:56 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: >Folks, > >We've had a couple of incidents of latent problems stemming from >invalid assumptions on bundle start order. Everything seems to be >fine, then

More entropy on bundle startup.

Folks, We've had a couple of incidents of latent problems stemming from invalid assumptions on bundle start order. Everything seems to be fine, then some trivial change reveals that we've failed to ensure that service 'a' is available before component 'b' needs it. by and large, we use DS to get