+1 for Apache Knox 1.5.0 RC1
- Verified the signatures for knox-source, knox, and knoxshell artifacts.
- Checked the CHANGES, LICENSE and NOTICE files
- Downloaded the source artifact, built it and executed the
unit/functional tests
- Tested the homepage
- Tested KnoxSSO and
+1 for Apache Knox 1.5.0 RC1
I've performed the following:
- Verified the signatures for knox-source, knox, and knoxshell artifacts.
- Checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files (already commented on the
copyright in the NOTICE)
- Downloaded the source artifact, built it and executed the
Hi folks,
IMO, the copyright date mismatch is not a blocker.
I'm giving a +1 for RC1.
I performed the following validation steps:
1. Verified the signature:
smolnar-MBP15:knox-1.5-RC1 smolnar$ gpg --verify knox-1.5.0.zip.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'knox-1.5.0.zip'
gpg: Signature made Sun
I would not consider it a blocker, but put it on the list in case we should
need another RC.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:21 PM larry mccay wrote:
> Yes, it should. Not sure whether this is a blocker or not. Thoughts?
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020, 9:59 PM Phil Zampino wrote:
>
>> Checking the NOTICE
Yes, it should. Not sure whether this is a blocker or not. Thoughts?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020, 9:59 PM Phil Zampino wrote:
> Checking the NOTICE file in the RC, it has the copyright date as
> 2012-20*19*.
> Should it rather be 2012-20*20*?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 2:59 PM larry mccay wrote:
Checking the NOTICE file in the RC, it has the copyright date as 2012-20*19*.
Should it rather be 2012-20*20*?
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 2:59 PM larry mccay wrote:
> All -
>
> Release candidate #1 for the Apache Knox 1.5.0 release is available at:
>
>
