Re: Reason why we don't use higher version of Jetty

2018-08-30 Thread Guang Yang
I think so. I will send out a patch later. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:17 PM, larry mccay wrote: > Did you resolve the issue? > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:10 PM Guang Yang wrote: > >> Ok, the issue seems goes away after I upgrade jetty to 9.3.10 on Knox >> 1.1.0. But there was some issue on Knox

Re: Reason why we don't use higher version of Jetty

2018-08-30 Thread larry mccay
Did you resolve the issue? On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:10 PM Guang Yang wrote: > Ok, the issue seems goes away after I upgrade jetty to 9.3.10 on Knox > 1.1.0. But there was some issue on Knox 0.13.0 + Jetty 9.3.10. > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Guang Yang wrote: > >> Hey Larry, >> >> We'r

Re: Reason why we don't use higher version of Jetty

2018-08-30 Thread Guang Yang
Ok, the issue seems goes away after I upgrade jetty to 9.3.10 on Knox 1.1.0. But there was some issue on Knox 0.13.0 + Jetty 9.3.10. On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Guang Yang wrote: > Hey Larry, > > We're using 0.13.0 and running on Linux version 4.4.92 (Debian 4.9.2-10), > the JDK version is

Re: Knox rules applied randomly

2018-08-30 Thread Sandeep Moré
Divya, I think this is because of the "path" rule is more open than the "queryv" rule. Can you try reordering the rules, putting "path" rule below "queryv" and see what you get. Also, I would suggest be more specific about the rules to avoid these issues. Best, Sandeep On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 a

Knox rules applied randomly

2018-08-30 Thread Divya Narayan
Hi, While trying to integrate CDAP with knox, we created rewrite and service rules for CDAP and content of those files looks like this: service.xml: Rewrite.xml: