Re: File descriptor limit for WAL

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Adar Dembo wrote: > It's definitely safe to increase the ulimit for open files; we > typically test with higher values (like 32K or 64K). We don't use > select(2) directly; any fd polling in Kudu is done via libev which I > believe uses

Re: File descriptor limit for WAL

I'm using the debs from the cloudera-kudu ppa with little change to the default configuration, so one master and one tablet server. I set num_replicas(1) when creating each table. I used range partitioning with (if I understand correctly) one large open-ended range. So that should have 334