> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sand Stone [mailto:sand.m.st...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 10:39 PM
> > > To: user@kudu.incubator.apache.org
> > > Cc: d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re:
tatefarm.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 ...this is a great recommendation
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sand Stone [mailto:sand.m.st...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 10:39 PM
> > To: user@kudu.incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: d...@kudu.incubator.apache.o
bject: Re: Proposal: remove default partitioning for new tables
>
> Agreed that this is a sensible API change.
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think this a very reasonable feature request. I have recently started
> >
+1 ...this is a great recommendation
-Original Message-
From: Sand Stone [mailto:sand.m.st...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 10:39 PM
To: user@kudu.incubator.apache.org
Cc: d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: remove default partitioning for new tables
Agreed
Agreed that this is a sensible API change.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Abhi Basu <9000r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this a very reasonable feature request. I have recently started
> working with Kudu and the "default" behavior has already tripped me up a
> couple times.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ab
I think this a very reasonable feature request. I have recently started
working with Kudu and the "default" behavior has already tripped me up a
couple times.
Thanks,
Abhi
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Dan Burkert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of the issues that trips up new Kudu users is the un
Hi all,
One of the issues that trips up new Kudu users is the uncertainty about how
partitioning works, and how to use partitioning effectively. Much of this
can be addressed with better documentation and explanatory materials, and
that should be an area of focus leading up to our 1.0 release. Ho
