another note :) :
CInclude -> cacheable
XInclude -> not cacheable
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I have not tried the "includes". (I thought it was 'c', not 'x').
Just a note:
XInclude is a W3C technology.
CInclude is a Cocoon-specific technology which is quite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I have not tried the "includes". (I thought it was 'c', not 'x').
Just a note:
XInclude is a W3C technology.
CInclude is a Cocoon-specific technology which is quite similar.
The CInclude transformer seems to be more performant and less buggy
(I recently notic
On 8/23/05, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have another question. For a part of the website I am
> currently building, I was juggling with the idea of putting all the
> content directly into a single xml file or to split it in logical
> units each one mapped to it own single xml f
Hello,
I have another question (again). For a part of the website I am
currently building, I was juggling with the idea of putting all the
content directly into a single xml file or to split it in logical
units each one mapped to it own single xml file and aggregate then
with the help of the xinc
