I'm trying to delete all the nodes in my graph. I iterate over all
relationships and delete them successfully. Then I iterate over all the
nodes and delete them (all node deletion is one transaction).
Every once in awhile, I get:
in
node.delete()
File "virtualenv/lib/python2.6/site-pa
Hi,
Regarding Neo4j project, is there any difference or priority about Sun-Java-6
or
OpenJDK?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Hi,
Neo4j is a multi graph -> there can exist multiple relationships between two
nodes even with the same type and direction. Each relationship has a unique
ID so you can tell them apart.
Whats your error message in detail?
cheers Martin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Marius Kubatz wrote:
>
Hi!
I have a very stupid question...
Is it ensured that a relationship between two Nodes stays a singleton, even
if another relationship of the same type and direction is added between
those Nodes?
Sometimes I get strange results when I delete nodes, that's why I ask.
Thanks in advance and best
> Mmm we cannot limit the number of relationships in this app. One the
> most important features
> is that we'll keep looking for good matches for the user.
>
Since the trimming algorithm will entirely delete low scoring relationships,
the search algorithm will also keep finding them again, and if
I think I fixed it now
2010/8/18 Peter Neubauer
> Niels, Mattias,
> I just refactored the maven site to load snippets from actually
> running code via Tobias' awesome maven hack, see
> https://svn.neo4j.org/components/meta-model/trunk/src/site/apt/index.apt
> . However, I don't know how to fix t
Sounds good to me!
2010/8/18 Todd Chaffee
> Hi Mattias,
>
> Yes, I think that might be you I was referring to. I'll post any ideas or
> questions I have to the mailing list as you suggested.
>
> Todd
> ___
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
>
Hi Craig,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Craig Taverner wrote:
>>
>> Limit meaning in this run? Or at all times? The first is ok, the
>> second not. I guess you mean exiting after I have computed already 10
>> new relationships right?
>>
>
> Well, actually I was aiming for an algorithm that wo
>
> Limit meaning in this run? Or at all times? The first is ok, the
> second not. I guess you mean exiting after I have computed already 10
> new relationships right?
>
Well, actually I was aiming for an algorithm that would converge on a stable
state. This means, if no new information is being a
Hi Mattias,
Yes, I think that might be you I was referring to. I'll post any ideas or
questions I have to the mailing list as you suggested.
Todd
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Hi David,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:35 AM, David Montag
wrote:
> Alberto,
>
> Hope your testing is coming along well. Feel free to post your progress to
> the list!
>
> David
Unfortunately I had to leave this subject on the side for some days
and now I'm catching up. I haven't done anything new
Hi Craig,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Craig Taverner wrote:
> I think leveraging existing relationships is obviously valuable, but I
> thought I'd throw in an idea for doing the original suggestion, pure random
> search:
Sounds interesting. I think the way to go is to leverage existing
rel
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, David Montag
wrote:
> From your description it sounds like the factors that influence the metric
> don't change, so a single calculation per pair is enough. In this case, you
> could just determine the pairs in some way and then do the computation,
> sto
Hi Mattias,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Mattias Persson
wrote:
> One benefit you of Neo4j is that you can get rid of these pesky
> background jobs and instead calculate such things on the fly quite
> fast, and not needing to store that calculated info at all. Tried it?
That sounds nice. I h
Hi Rick,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM, wrote:
> Sounds like a pretty easy SQL query, though. ;-)
We are using SQL right now. We have the users table and a table called
user_matches with following columns (simplified version):
user_1_id
user_2_id
result
The first 2 columns are foreign key
Hi,
unfortunately I had to step aside from this subject for some days and
now I'm trying to catch up with all your suggestions.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Niels Hoogeveen
wrote:
>
> Is it possible to encode the absence of a relationship with a relationship in
> your application?
That wa
Very cool Paddy,
seems things are progressing at your end! If you could remove previous
routes and markers when clicking on new information it would
de-clutter the UI considerably ...
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Pho
Niels, Mattias,
I just refactored the maven site to load snippets from actually
running code via Tobias' awesome maven hack, see
https://svn.neo4j.org/components/meta-model/trunk/src/site/apt/index.apt
. However, I don't know how to fix the broken example code on the site
for the restictions, see
h
Maybe you're refering to me :) ?
I'm quite busy with other projects at the moment, but I'd be heppy to help
out when time becomes available. Is there any chance such a discussion could
be started on this mailing list, where maybe I, Tobias and others can chip
in?
2010/8/16 Todd Chaffee
> Peter,
19 matches
Mail list logo
