Hi,
I was importing a reasonably large OSM dataset into Neo4j Spatial, and this
involves a batch inserter which imports everything, followed by switching to
a normal embedded graph database for adding nodes to the RTree index, which
is an in-graph tree structure. The batch inserter phase worked
The error occurs here:
catch ( OutOfMemoryError e )
{
e.printStackTrace();
ooe++;
logWarn( Unable to allocate direct buffer );
}
And I assume that's why the jdk classloader can't load the stuff needed for
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:05 PM, rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com
rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com wrote:
Also, I assume the new string storage system works with existing neo
databases?
Yes, as I have explained in my emails to this list before, and in my blog
post describing this
2011/2/26 rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com
rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com:
Any update on compatibility of the new index subsystem with the old one? The
particular issue was with removing full text indexed nodes (method signature
with only node and key was missing in the new index
Awesome! Great job, Tobias.
From: tobias.ivars...@neopersistence.com
[mailto:tobias.ivars...@neopersistence.com] On Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 8:58 AM
To: rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com
Cc: Neo user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Two new milestones:
It may be that too many files are open... there has been some previous
mail about batch insertion (refering to lucene index insertion)
keeping files open. Could you do an:
lsof -n | grep name-of-your-store-dir | wc
and see if that returns a high number, 1000 or something?
2011/2/26 Michael
You guys rock. Any chance of backporting those index API methods to 1.2?
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Mattias Persson
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 9:05 AM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wondering if something didn't get committed somewhere? I tried both with
an update as well as with a fresh checkout and am getting a ton of test
errors, not failures.
Here's a sample Surefire output. This was gotten from a fresh checkout
running mvn
Victor,
virus alert?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database.
Nolan,
I am running GIT fresh tests without problems. Are you having some old
Java process running? Seems Neo4j refuses to start because it can't
lock the files ...
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn
No so fast This is good stuff --- I don't want to be impotent anymore!
On Feb 26, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
Victor,
virus alert?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn
If I had known - I can get you some, got loads of interesting offers
that I discard - don't you Americans get them who actually need it? ;)
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Hi,
I ran the test again with parallel logging of lsof once a minute and ps once
every ten minutes. The open file descriptors oscillated around 200, peaking
at 218, and at 211 just before the crash, so this seems OK. The memory was
around 2.3GB for the entire batch insertion, but went up to
It is working for me too.
One thing that is interesting about the error message is that it says it
looks like another instance is running in the *same JVM*. Is that the usual
error message? (complete text was this is usually caused by another Neo4j
kernel already running in this JVM for this
What about the IOException Operation not permitted ?
Can you check the access rights on your store?
While googling I saw that you had a similar problem in November, that Johan
answered.
From the answer it seems that the kernel adapts its memory usage and
segmentation from the store size.
So as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/2011 05:56 PM, Craig Taverner wrote:
It is working for me too.
One thing that is interesting about the error message is that it says it
looks like another instance is running in the *same JVM*. Is that the usual
error message? (complete
Mmmh,
the index provider kernel extension subsystem has been changed between
1.3.M01 and M02. I suspect an incompatible kernel version being
resolved by maven. let me try to run this tomorrow from home with
moving away my current maven repo and get everything fresh. (Sitting
on a 3G conenction
Mmmh,
the index provider kernel extension subsystem has been changed between
1.3.M01 and M02. I suspect an incompatible kernel version being
resolved by maven. let me try to run this tomorrow from home with
moving away my current maven repo and get everything fresh. (Sitting
on a 3G conenction
Any .NET developers out there?
Which .NET binding do you recommend, Neo4RestNet or Neo4jRestSharp?
Or maybe just using it directly through rest?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
19 matches
Mail list logo
