Is the 1.4 auto-index only exact? Or can it be configured to be a
fulltext index?
(Btw, it would be awesome if we could have two auto-indexes: one exact, one
full-text. It would be great in general if all indexing could be auto. Not
sure when you would ever want/need manual indexing.)
Aseem
We transform some of our properties currently before (manually) indexing
them. Simple examples are lowercase (fulltext indexes supports a
lowercase config that defaults to true, but exact ones don't, I was
disappointed to find), but more complex ones are e.g. stripping special
characters.
It
Hi,
This week I added just more spatial functions:
ST_LengthInMeters
ST_LengthInMiles
ST_LongestLine
ST_DistanceInMeters
ST_DistanceInMiles
ST_MaxDistance
ST_MaxDistanceInMeter
ST_MaxDistanceInMiles
ST_ShortestLine
ST_SymDifference
ST_DelaunayTriangle
ST_Difference
ST_ConvexHull
ST_Boundary
Wilhelm,
You are crunching it! Good work, hope to help out with the docs.
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas Wilhelm a...@kabelbw.de wrote:
Hi,
This week I added just more spatial functions:
ST_LengthInMeters
ST_LengthInMiles
ST_LongestLine
ST_DistanceInMeters
Btw,
Is this all generic or implemented for OSM only?
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas Wilhelm a...@kabelbw.de wrote:
Hi,
This week I added just more spatial functions:
ST_LengthInMeters
ST_LengthInMiles
ST_LongestLine
ST_DistanceInMeters
ST_DistanceInMiles
better that a singleton: get it injected!
And you don't need a DI framework for that just System separation in Bootstrap
and Runtime.
PS I recommend the cleancoders.com videos to everyone. Great content fun
mobile mail please excuse brevity and typos
Am 16.07.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Rick
It makes perfect sense to be able to create multiple relatationships between
two nodes, once you consider that relationships have properties.
For example:
Elizabeth Taylor --MARRIED_TO [from: 1964, to: 1974]-- Richard BurtonElizabeth
Taylor --MARRIED_TO [from: 1975, to: 1976]-- Richard Burton
It should be working with all layers which are implementing the
EditLayer or Layer interface, but I tested it only with OSMLayer.
Am 16.07.2011 10:03, schrieb Peter Neubauer:
Btw,
Is this all generic or implemented for OSM only?
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Jul 16, 2011 9:56 AM, Andreas
Hello,
I try to use Neo4J in a Ruby on Rails application (MRI Ruby not JRuby). Due to
Rails process-based model I run one instance of the EmbeddedGraphDatabase in a
separate process. All write updates coming in from user actions are delegated
to this process. The EmbeddedGraphDatabase here
Ok,
Cool, will take a look.
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Jul 16, 2011 12:49 PM, Andreas Wilhelm a...@kabelbw.de wrote:
It should be working with all layers which are implementing the
EditLayer or Layer interface, but I tested it only with OSMLayer.
Am 16.07.2011 10:03, schrieb Peter
Hi Mattias,
If I understand you correctly, you're pointing two database instances (one
being read-only) at the same on-disk location. Is that correct?
Jim
On 16 Jul 2011, at 07:37, Mathias Hensel wrote:
Hello,
I try to use Neo4J in a Ruby on Rails application (MRI Ruby not JRuby). Due
Hi,
Is there an updated version for Neoclipe for M06? I'm not able to open the
DB created with the latest version in the older Neoclipse?
Any other suggestions?
Regards,
Dharmendra.
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
Hi Dharmendra,
I'm happily using the 1.4 M04 Neoclipse with the 1.4GA release of Neo4j on mac
osx. What symptoms are you seeing?
Jim
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
It works as a charm :) Thanks Jim!
- Dharmendra.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Dharmendra Kumar
dharmendra...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the reply Jim! I'm getting the following error when trying to
open the DB in Neoclipse (1.4 M04):
TransactionFailureException: Could not create data
That's clear. Such mappings are more difficult to traverse since the
traverser has to know if there is such a hyper edge vertex. I'm
wondering if there is no need to provide an embedded solution for such a
transformation. Each user who is confronted with hyper edges has to
implement some kind of
Hey guys -
I just released Bulbflow, a new Python framework for graph databases.
It supports Neo4j and Gremlin through Rexster, and it's online at
http://bulbflow.com .
Enjoy!
- James
--
View this message in context:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 15:40, espeed ja...@jamesthornton.com wrote:
Hey guys -
I just released Bulbflow, a new Python framework for graph databases.
It supports Neo4j and Gremlin through Rexster, and it's online at
http://bulbflow.com .
That's really cool!
It seems like we were doing same
I completely agree,
hyperedges and the accompanying traversers should be handled in a library. As
you probably know the traversal framework currently also uses the core API
under the hood to perform the traversals (and no black magic (yet)).
So it should be fairly easy to take that
Thanks! This makes perfect sense and has deepened my understanding of how to
use graphs.
Nonetheless, I still have a practical problem, I am using REST to interact
with the datastore and if I query if a relationship exists before creating
every relationship, it's going to be really slow. I am
Hi Javier -
Thanks! Yeah, Bulbflow (Bulbs) is what I was talking in when we were
commenting in Hacker News a few weeks ago
(http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2684816). I have used your API for the
Neo4j REST server, but I didn't know you were working on one for Rexster too
-- we should exchange
20 matches
Mail list logo
