Here you go:
https://github.com/neo4j/graph-collections/wiki/HyperRelationship-example
Though that page just has a link to:
https://github.com/neo4j/graph-collections/wiki/Enhanced-API
Bryce
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 5:00 PM, loldrup lold...@gmail.com wrote:
Niels Hoogeveen wrote:
I just
When I wrote the wiki page for Enhanced-API, I ended up using all the words I
had spent on the hyperrelationship example, so I decided to keep the original
page alive, but link it to the enhanced API page.
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:45:47 +1200
From: bryc...@gmail.com
To:
You raise interesting questions, most of them very much related to the work I
did on Enhanced API.
Let me start with the distinction between Node and Relationship, which in my
opinion too is a bit artificial. I understand when creating a graph database,
it is helpful to have something like
That's a great summary, Niels. Very similar to how we've applied Neo4J here at
ThingWorx, though we've done most of the type system work (nodes and
relationships are all typed/subtyped) in our application domain layer. A few
other items that we leveraged in our implementation that you may
We're using Neo4J to model the real world with things here at ThingWorx as
well. See my responses to Niels for some specifics.
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of
loldrup [lold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday,
Ahoy
and thx, that is helpful.
but here comes yet another newbie question.
is it possible to do smth like the following
START source = (nodeIndexSources,querySources),
target = (nodeIndexTargets,queryTargets)
MATCH (source)-![:unwantedRelationshipType]-(target)
RETURN source,target
where
Right now it's not possible. It's a planned feature, but it's not done.
It will not make into 1.5. That's all I know right now.
Sorry, and thanks for your patience and feedback!
Andrés
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:45 PM, st.pa st...@web.de wrote:
Ahoy
and thx, that is helpful.
but here
Great thoughts guys!
I think it would be interesting to break out the Enhanced API from
graph-collections, rename it into something better (we can think of a
name together) and provide a more fully fledged example that we can
document and evolve.
WDYT?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk:
Hi there,
Maybe you can create an issue so we can track it?
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Sep 24, 2011 3:52 PM, Andres Taylor andres.tay...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
Right now it's not possible. It's a planned feature, but it's not done.
It will not make into 1.5. That's all I know right now.
+1
Enhanced API grew out of a couple of classes I added to make
IndexedRelationship work more easily (not exposing comparators), but it is
essentially a separate component. Giving it that status would help other's
improve it. Having laid some of the ground work, I feel it needs other people's
done.
-- https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/30
24.09.2011 16:15, Peter Neubauer wrote:
Hi there,
Maybe you can create an issue so we can track it?
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Sep 24, 2011 3:52 PM, Andres Taylorandres.tay...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
Right now it's not
Subtyping of relationship types sounds like the cure to my problems.
When creating a relationship IS_A_JANITOR_OF, will a corresponding
relationship type IS_A_JANITOR_OF-relationship-type automatically be
created?
If I have a simple relationship can I then ask which relationship types it's
type
I too think that much of the type system of the application actually belongs in
the application domain layer. There are so many trade-offs that can be made
that a one-size-fits-all typing of a graph is not the way to go. This is why I
decided that enhanced-api should only provide the nuts and
Subtyping works as follows in Enhanced API.
When calling getRelationships(RelationshipType, Direction) or any of its
alternatives, the API looks up all subtypes of that relationship type and then
call getRelationshipTypes(Direction, RelationshipType and its subtypes). All
you need to do is
Thanks!
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Sep 24, 2011 5:08 PM, st.pa st...@web.de wrote:
done.
-- https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/30
24.09.2011 16:15, Peter Neubauer wrote:
Hi there,
Maybe you can create an issue so we can track it?
/peter
Sent from my phone.
On Sep 24, 2011
Quite wrong.
IS_JANITOR_OF will stick you into a boxed node ordinal.
What you really want when modeling the world is to only capture the
semantic relationships themselves. IS_A being a core semantic
relationship. I am a janitor. He IS_A janitor. What is a janitor ? What
properties does a
Hmm.. Which book would you recommend me to read?
Jon
On Sep 24, 2011 7:55 PM, Thad Guidry [via Neo4j Community Discussions]
ml-node+s438527n3364798...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
Quite wrong.
IS_JANITOR_OF will stick you into a boxed node ordinal.
What you really want when modeling the world is
Unfortunately, most of what I describe as best practices in modeling
semantic relationships has not been written well ENOUGH in most books.
However the W3C community lists such as SKOS and RDFa have many experts
that have deep knowledge around those best practices. Asking your questions
there on
What if:
Joe WORKS_AT the school
Joe WORKS_AS a janitor
The school HAS_A janitor
How do I denote that Joe works as I janitor at that exact school?
Do you see other problems in the notation above?
Also, thank you very much for your thought inspiring reply!
Jon
On Sep 24, 2011 7:55 PM, Thad
2011/9/10 Linan Wang tali.w...@gmail.com
Andreas,
thanks. can't wait for your result.
one correction on my list:
Retrieve a certain types of relationships of a node should be faster
than retrieve all. i mis-read the source code in NodeImpl.java, in
which private volatile RelIdArray[]
For the record, that branch is outdated and not working correctly in HA
mode.
2011/9/12 Peter Neubauer pe...@neubauer.se
James,
we are experimenting with that feature, namely, not forcing a flush()
at the end of a transaction and let the OS take care of the actual
flushing. You potentially
So... that type of modeling is more inline with NLP and Noun / Verb Property
linkage. Which you can do. Do you need to also then describe semantically
the WORKS_AT relationship ? You could give all relationships themselves
describing properties, OR perhaps just link them to a SKOS_CONCEPT of
hi all ,
This is my code:
When the method been requested in a concurrent request . 100 concurrent
I got the log like this:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/file/n3365819/zuse.png
I have been blocked? why?
Waiting the answer .Thank you.
--
View this message in
I'm going to take a slightly different tack here than the responses you've
got so far...
First as others have pointed out, this is three entities and two
relationships
joe - is a - janitor - at the - school
This is important, the lighter weight the relationships, the less problem
you are
Your code did not come through for me. You might want to use
http://pastebin.com/ and post a link in your message.
Kind regards,
McKinley
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:03 PM, iamyuanlong yuanlong1...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all ,
This is my code:
When the method been requested in a concurrent
25 matches
Mail list logo
