at it right now
2011/6/17 Kalin Wilson Development d...@kalinwilson.com
Perhaps this is fixed in the latest milestone release, I haven't had a
chance to test it yet. I upgraded from 1.3M03 to 1.4M03 and found that my
code that queried node indexes using a QueryContext was throwing a NPE
Perhaps this is fixed in the latest milestone release, I haven't had a chance
to test it yet. I upgraded from 1.3M03 to 1.4M03 and found that my code that
queried node indexes using a QueryContext was throwing a NPE. In my code I
constructed a string similar to eclass:org.spp.data.Something AND
Thanks Anders,
I changed the connection mode in Neoclipse to read only embedded but I still
can't have both clients attached at the same time. I get the typical lock error
message. I'll try to troubleshoot it in more detail and let you know what I'm
seeing.
Kalin
On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:20 AM,
I built Neoclipse from source against the 1.2 jars. I'd like to use it while
debugging an app using an embedded DB. When I connect with the remote option, I
still can't access the DB if my app has the DB open. Will that be resolved or
is it supported now?
Also, if I connect to the DB with
Peter,
Those are certainly viable alternatives (need to investigate further), but most
involve learning another language/interface or working at the command line or
within a script.
The ubiquity of SQL access to a database is a big factor when considering
migration. One of my teammates is much
I'm currently prototyping an application that will use both a RDBMS and Neo4j
in parallel. The RDBMS currently exists as the backing store for a web
application. While it's feasible to move all of the data into Neo4j, that's not
politically palatable right now. So I plan to use Neo4j to store
I'm prototyping an app using Neo4j. Currently for testing and familiarity I can
generate a random network of any size.
I am using JIT (http://thejit.org) to visualize the graph on a web page via
Javascript, basically using the Force Directed example 2 with my JSON data
instead of the example
Thanks again, Craig. I think we're on the same track. I agree about the 'join'
node. I'm not quite sure what to call it yet in my model but the concept looks
right.
Thanks for the traversal tips, they make sense too.
Kalin
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Craig Taverner wrote:
Hi Kalin,
I'm
Thanks for your suggestions regarding my model, Craig. I agree about the ids.
Using a generalization for Asset Types might be something to look at.
I'm still stuck on wanting to capture the general nature of an Asset as well as
the specific triple of Producer-Asset-Consumer. I'll have to think
Thanks Mattias. I agree about storing the IDs, it doesn't feel right but I'm
still working out the best network model.
Thanks for the example, I guess I need to relook at when to use a filter vs
control the traversal other ways.
On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Mattias Persson wrote:
Hi Kalin,
10 matches
Mail list logo