to have feedback
before doing so.
Niels Hoogeveen
_
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
http://windows.microsoft.com/shop
___
Neo
...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] indexing mode on MetamodelProperties
You mean to limit the length of a String? I'd say it's a little bit
unnecessary, at least I see no point in it. Could you provide a usecase for
it?
2010/5/1 Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
with the meta model!
2010/5/1, Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com:
Today I added an indexing mode to MetamodelProperties, with the following
options.
NO_INDEX (default)INDEX UNIQUE_INDEXFULL_TEXT_INDEX
The functionality added does not perform any indexing itself, but provides
Today I added an indexing mode to MetamodelProperties, with the following
options.
NO_INDEX (default)INDEX UNIQUE_INDEXFULL_TEXT_INDEX
The functionality added does not perform any indexing itself, but provides
information about which properties need to be indexed and what mode of indexing
, 25 Apr 2010 21:45:08 +0200
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] Cleaning up relationshiptypes
2010/4/25 Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
I see the deeper issue to the cleanup problem is the fact that it is
impossible to list all
of course
love to hear about it.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Niels Hoogeveen
pd_aficion...@hotmail.comwrote:
I haven't found any functionality to remove relationshiptypes from the
database. Once a relationshiptype is used it seems to remain in the database
forever
with relationshiptypes that are no longer in use, and will
probably never be used again.
Niels Hoogeveen
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click
Did you use maven when building the jars? The dependencies listed in maven,
make sure the proper versions of other components are downloaded.
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:31:42 -0400
From: mhgr...@gmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo] help w/ neo4j sesame sail
I'm trying to get
: Feedback request
To: Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
Cc: Neo Devteam devt...@neotechnology.com
I'd say go for it, but you could bump the version (in pom.xml) to
0.9-SNAPSHOT before committing so that it doesn't break for people doing an
mvn -U. And then when doing changes in meta
The updates are in SVN now.
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:43:12 +0200
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] Fwd: Feedback request
2010/4/21 Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
I agree with your observations and changed the names
It means that while the Relationship exists, it's associated RelationshipType
no longer/not yet exists. Somehow a relationship got created for which the
RelationshipType has Id = 3, while there is no such RelationshipType in the
database, or at least the lookup of the name of the
model of Neo4J.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:37:37 +0200
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
2010/3/30 Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
MetaModelObject already has a getter (without using
) and not the actual data it would have conform
to it.
Help me understand which benefits you're after by modeling the top level
of your actual data into the meta model itself.
Best,
Mattias
2010/4/8 Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
The example of the tag library
: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
2010/4/8 Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
Your point about the cardinality restriction is a correct observation.
In fact it would be better to create a is-subdivision-of PropertyType on
sub-division and give that a range country with a cardinality
? I mean should we have a
MetaModelClass#setSingleton(boolean) or something so that this
behaviour can be controlled?
2010/4/8, Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com:
Each country needs to be modeled as classes, because I want to set the
restriction that French regions (which can have
If only reference classes can be added, what are appropriate types. Should I
use java.lang.Integer when the underlying property value is and int and
java.lang.Long when using a long?
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Date: Sat, 3 Apr
, is this a feature?
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01
There certainly should be an onBeforeSuccess event, that can roll back the
current transaction. I would like to maintain a graph that is guaranteed to be
consistent with the MetaModel, so having a log of violations wouldn't be good
enough.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: tobias.ivars
Datavalue, and see a constructor:
DataRange(String datatype, Datavalue... values)
That way the possible values a property can have additional properties and
relationships (eg. link to Wordnet definition or Wikipedia entry).
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:30:10 +0200
that would
allow the modeling of the properties of a Relationship.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:26:29 +0100
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
That's an interresting case you've got here and it looks to me like
for a given property class.
I don't see a MetaModelRelationships, which is unfortunate, since that would
allow the modeling of the properties of a Relationship.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:26:29 +0100
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user
of the properties of a Relationship.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:26:29 +0100
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
That's an interresting case you've got here and it looks to me like it's
frameworks are awesome. At least we can change and extend them more easily!
-Original Message-
From: Niels Hoogeveen pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:20:15
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
Making MetaModelThing implement
regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: neubauer.pe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:25:01 +0100
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
Awesome Niels!
maybe you could blog or document some cool example on this?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
://github.com/NielsHoogeveen/Scala-Neo4j-utils
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: neubauer.pe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:25:01 +0100
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] meta meta classes
Awesome Niels!
maybe you could blog or document some cool example on this?
Cheers
like to know if this is the correct approach to this situation, or
whether there are better alternatives.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
_
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn
: [Neo] basic questions
That sounds pretty cool. Do you have a github project?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Niels Hoogeveen
pd_aficion...@hotmail.comwrote:
The example I provided is in effect nothing but a couple of nested
iterations, so nothing like a real traversal
in relationshipfilters and
nodefilters, but allows for nicer organization of the code.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: okramma...@gmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:59:27 -0600
Subject: Re: [Neo] basic questions
Hi,
The example I provided is in effect nothing but a couple
Github project is up and running:
http://github.com/NielsHoogeveen/Scala-Neo4j-utils
For now it contains only one file with my first attempt writing a traverser in
Scala.
Scala version 2.8 is required.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: linxbet...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:21
of j
if(k.getProperty(CREATED) = 2010-03-17); // filters the properties of
the relation bound to k
)yield{
println(k.getProperty(name))
}
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
From: okramma...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:37:32 -0700
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] basic
.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:30:04 +0100
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo] LuceneIndexService dependencies on EmbeddedGraphDatabase
Yep, LuceneIndexService needs to register itself as an XA resource and
needs the XA
Thank you Johan,
I was actually happy with this bug, because it brought to my attention that
some text fields in my source database were extremely large due to some white
space explosion. Still it's good to see the issue is solved.
Kind regards,
Niels Hoogeveen
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:44
201 - 232 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
