One question, and I bet I won't be the only one asking it...
If SQL is the target to mimic, why not WHERE instead of PATTERN ?
Otherwise, wouldn't xQuery be perhaps an even more logical target?
Peter Hunsberger
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Peter Neubauer
peter.neuba
). Not sure it would map
directly to what you want, but I suspect you could build a syntax that was
more xQuery like than you will ever be able to build a syntax that
is truly SQL like?
Peter Hunsberger
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Andres Taylor
andres.tay...@neotechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4
to go get some sleep.
Hope this helps.
Peter Hunsberger
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:52 AM, loldrup lold...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to model the world most flexibly (okay, so I'm
sticking to modelling organisations for now, but still). My main problem
seems to occur when
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Jim Webber j...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Hello Aliabbas,
It's domain specific, but in general you write less in a graph db because the
power is in relationships.
Imagine something akin to Digg where lots of users follow the postings of
other users. Each
that are not necessarily directly related to the
logical model; read / write ratios, total data volumes, concurrent
access etc., but the logical model may be the same in both cases.
Peter Hunsberger
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org
Better for what? Speed efficency, use integers. However, there are some
use cases where an integer is not big enough...
On Jun 14, 2011 7:47 AM, Aman aman.6...@gmail.com wrote:
Which one is better? and how? Indexing Strings or Indexing Integers? Please
explain in a way that a newbie to indexing
6 matches
Mail list logo
