Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #2

Very nice Andreas! You consider it safe to pull these changes into the main repo? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #2

I suggest you code review them first. Especially since there are API changes. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Very nice Andreas! You consider it safe to pull these changes into the main repo? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk:

Re: [Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #2

Well first I should add some more documentation/comments :-P and then we could review the code. Am 07.06.2011 22:29, schrieb Craig Taverner: I suggest you code review them first. Especially since there are API changes. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Peter Neubauer

[Neo4j] GSoC 2011 Neo4j Geoprocessing | Weekly Report #2

Hi, This week I implemented update and search capability for spatial functions and following spatial functions with JUnit tests: ST_AsText, ST_AsKML, ST_AsGeoJSON, ST_AsBinary and ST_Reverse. Best Regards Andreas ___ Neo4j mailing list