: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: RE: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 04:00:18 +0200
I uploaded the first edit (still needs to completely be tested - IS-PRE-ALPHA
quality) of the enhanced API.
See:
https://github.com/peterneubauer/graph
and documented. I posted it on Github for two reasons:
safety and to gather feedback about the design.
Niels
From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:26:53 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
I don't understand why you wrapped
@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
I don't understand why you wrapped _all_ the classes, this will make this
package very brittle as it has to copy all API changes?
I rather thought of a better / fluent / more usable API on top of the
existing one.
something like
how I want to do that).
Niels
From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:19:55 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Ok, makes sense.
It just hard to see what is new in that package and what is just hiding the
original API
From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 04:00:18 +0200
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
I uploaded the first edit (still needs to completely be tested - IS-PRE-ALPHA
quality) of the enhanced API.
See:
https://github.com/peterneubauer
of the data
types supported by PropertyContainer.
I will upload this within the next few days.
Niels
From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: RE: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:59:08 +0200
I think a hypergraph would be an interesting
here.
Niels
From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:37:48 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
I completely agree,
hyperedges and the accompanying traversers should be handled in a library.
As you probably know
: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:59:08 +0200
I think a hypergraph would be an interesting collection to support in
neo-graph-collections. If I find the time, I will make a start with it this
week, unless there are of course other volunteers :wink: willing to do
by PropertyContainer.
I will upload this within the next few days.
Niels
From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: RE: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:59:08 +0200
I think a hypergraph would be an interesting collection to support in
neo
:52 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Perhaps we can also add to this enhanced API:
* creation of nodes and rels with a initial map of properties, with optional
auto-indexing of some of those properties
* a getOrCreate method
* fluent, chained API
: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Cool Nils,
where should it live? Some own package or?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
to PropetyContainer would also be helpful for fast
lookup of uris and generally for the creation of unique keys.
Niels
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:38:15 +0200
From: matt...@neotechnology.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Niels,
sounds like fun. Looking
, 16 Jul 2011 23:37:48 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
I completely agree,
hyperedges and the accompanying traversers should be handled in a library. As
you probably know the traversal framework currently also uses the core API
under the hood
relationship.
Complex types can either be stored into a byte array or if appropriate in
multiple properties.
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:04:15 +0200
From: ntausc...@gmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Hi,
is there a possibility to store hyper edges
Jul 2011 19:31:22 +0200
From: ntausc...@gmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
That's clear. Such mappings are more difficult to traverse since the
traverser has to know if there is such a hyper edge vertex. I'm
wondering if there is no need to provide
Hi,
is there a possibility to store hyper edges in Neo4j? Is there a plan to
implement this?
Will Neo4j get the ability to store complex types in addition to
primitve data types for properties of nodes and relationships?
--
Best regards
Norbert Tausch
+0200
From: ntausc...@gmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Hi,
is there a possibility to store hyper edges in Neo4j? Is there a plan to
implement this?
Will Neo4j get the ability to store complex types in addition to
primitve data types
.
Complex types can either be stored into a byte array or if appropriate in
multiple properties.
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:04:15 +0200
From: ntausc...@gmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges and Objects
Hi,
is there a possibility to store hyper edges in Neo4j
18 matches
Mail list logo
