Aug 2011 18:19:00 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Hyperedges in Neo4j
Hi folks,
I took a discussion over at Tinkerpop as the excuse to put in an example
of
modeling and traversing Hyperedges in neo4j (in this case with Gremlin).
Of
course this is nowhere near Nils
Hey,
I think a traversal should in principal be performed with a query language
that is not turing complete so we can guarantee termination.
Turning completeness is not the lower bound for non-guaranteed termination. You
can't guarantee completion in a regular language when your String (data
tasks we are not interested in such
statements and in fact like to see those eliminated.
Niels
From: okramma...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:17:27 -0600
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Hyperedges in Neo4j
Hey,
I think a traversal should in principal be performed
Hi folks,
I took a discussion over at Tinkerpop as the excuse to put in an example of
modeling and traversing Hyperedges in neo4j (in this case with Gremlin). Of
course this is nowhere near Nils thinking, but for simple cases this might
serve as a pattern.
http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot
4 matches
Mail list logo
