ode, but it
> makes sense to at least have a batch loader for indexes.
> Niels
> P.S. Are you making any progress with the port of the RTree to
> graph-collections?
>
> > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:29:28 +0200
> > From: cr...@amanzi.com
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
&g
the RTree to
graph-collections?
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:29:28 +0200
> From: cr...@amanzi.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
> Not sure if this will be the same for you, but we were not able to use the
> RTree in batch inserter
hael.hun...@neotechnology.com
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:57:37 +0200
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
> Can't you rebalance the tree by just marking nodes as deleted? (setting
> properties or collecting their id's somewhere?)
>
t;>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Andrew White
>> wrote:
>>>>> I don't know if this is the right place to ask this; but does it
>> support
>>>>> a batch insert mode? When I am bulk loading data I don't have Node
>&g
hun...@neotechnology.com
> > Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:56:30 +0200
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
> >
> > But I'm not sure when in 1.5 this is going to be addressed.
> >
> > So if Niels could look at the effo
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
> But I'm not sure when in 1.5 this is going to be addressed.
>
> So if Niels could look at the effort needed and perhaps pair with Andrew on
> getting this done (or at least give him some pointers to impl
>> On 07/07/2011 06:19 PM, Niels Hoogeveen wrote:
>>> I created a wiki page for indexed relationships in the Git repo, see:
>>> https://github.com/peterneubauer/graph-collections/wiki/Indexed-relationships
>>>
>>>> From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
>&
ub.com/peterneubauer/graph-collections/wiki/Indexed-relationships
>>
>>> From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
>>> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:53:05 +0200
>>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>>>
>>> Could you
ationships in the Git repo, see:
> https://github.com/peterneubauer/graph-collections/wiki/Indexed-relationships
>
>> From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:53:05 +0200
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationsh
e: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:53:05 +0200
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>>
>> Could you put these code examples into the Readme for the project or on a
>> wiki page?
>>
>> Am 07.07.2011 um 22:11 schrieb Niels Hoogeveen
nder(graphDb(), Direction.OUTGOING,
> > RelTypes.INDEXED_RELATIONSHIP);
> >
> > for(Relationship rel: re1.expand(indexedNode)){
> > System.out.println(rel.getEndNode().getProperty("name"));
> > }
> > for(Relationship rel: re2.expand(indexedNod
ionships cannot support the getId() method,and will throw
>> an UnsupportedOperationException when being called.IndexedRelationship will
>> implement Iterable.With these changes, it is possible to
>> create an Expander and I am working right now to implement that.Niels
>>
>&g
println(re2.getEndNode().getProperty("name"));
}
> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:55:36 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
>
> Hi Michael,I realize that the implementation of IndexedRelationship can in
; >> As to the name of the class.
> >> It is essentially an indexed relationship,
> >> and not just a solution to the densely-connected-node problem.
> >> An indexed relationship can also be used to maintain
> >> a sorted set of
ed.IndexedRelationship will
> implement Iterable.With these changes, it is possible to create
> an Expander and I am working right now to implement that.Niels
>
>> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:46:35 +0200
>> S
:35 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I haven't yet worked on an example.
>
> There are tests for the SortedTree implementation,
> but didn't add those to the IndexedRelationship class,
> which is simply a wrapper arou
arantee unicity constraints. Niels
> From: michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:27:00 +0200
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
> Good work,
>
> do you have an example ready (and/or some tests that show how it works
; relationship types in incoming direction. Of course this functionality is
> also covered in the API.
> Niels
>
>> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 02:36:29 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationsh
e: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 02:36:29 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
>
> Pushed SortedTree to Git after adding a unit test and doing some debugging.
> TODO:Add API for indexed relationships using SortedTree as the
> implementation.Make SortedTree thread safe.
> W
> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:27:57 +0200
> From: neubauer.pe...@gmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
> Great work Nils!
>
> /peter
>
> Sent from my phone.
> On Jul 4, 2011 11:39 PM, "Niels Hoogeveen"
>
>> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
>> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
>> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:49:45 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>>
>>
>> I forgot to add another recurrent issue that can be solved with indexed
relationships: guaranteed unicity constr
indexed relationships. (Community input still
welcome).Write unit tests.Make SortedTree thread safe (Community help still
welcome).
Niels
> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:49:45 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Indexed relationshi
I forgot to add another recurrent issue that can be solved with indexed
relationships: guaranteed unicity constraints.
> From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 01:55:08 +0200
> Subject: [Neo4j] Indexed relationships
>
>
>
In the thread [Neo4j] traversing densely populated nodes we discussed the
problems arising when large numbers of relationships are added to the same node.
Over the weekend, I have worked on a solution for the dense-relationship-nodes
using SortedTree in the neo-graph-collections component. After
24 matches
Mail list logo
