Have you got any use case where this would be a necessary thing to have and
where the current model wouldn't suffice? Just curious.
2011/6/17 Aniceto Pérez y Madrid ape...@innovasoftps.com
I agree,a Node is something that has 2 (user managed) fields:
Relationship[]
Property[]
and a
Sorry, disregard my question, I read your example in another mail now.
2011/6/18 Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com
Have you got any use case where this would be a necessary thing to have and
where the current model wouldn't suffice? Just curious.
2011/6/17 Aniceto Pérez y Madrid
I agree,a Node is something that has 2 (user managed) fields:
Relationship[]
Property[]
and a Relationship is something that has 2 (user managed) fields:
Node[2]
Property[]
and currently Property has two fields
String key
Object value
where Object can be a scalar or array of basic types:
Aniceto,
introducing real Node and Relationship links as fields on Nodes and
relationships would essentially blur the distinction between Nodes,
Properties and Relationships, and let you treat the graph as a
Hypergraph. We find that model too abstract and hard to deal with the
edge cases of these
4 matches
Mail list logo
