Hi Mattias,
> Traversers works the same way (with POST)... I'm almost positive you were
> there, Jim, when we decided on not going with the
> HTTP-FORM-style-question-mark-parameters-pattern-or-whats-is-called. Or is
> this something different?
I don't think I was there for traversers - I only re
2010/9/17 Jim Webber
> I'm not convinced I like the way this works:
>
> > POST /node/123/paths {"to": "http://localhost:/node/456";,
> "algorithm":
> > "shortestPath", "max depth": 100}
>
> Isn't the intention to retrieve the shortest path? If so I'd prefer:
>
> GET
> /node/123/paths?to=http
Until Neo4j supports operations on distributed graphs, couldn't we assume the
destination
is another node in the same graph and clean that up to:
GET /node/123/paths?to=456&algorithm=shortestPath&maxDepth=100
Also, I believe Neo4j only has a stable of reindeer. Would one of them do?
/Andreas
O
I'm not convinced I like the way this works:
> POST /node/123/paths {"to": "http://localhost:/node/456";, "algorithm":
> "shortestPath", "max depth": 100}
Isn't the intention to retrieve the shortest path? If so I'd prefer:
GET
/node/123/paths?to=http%3a%2f%2flocalhost:%2fnode%2f456&al
4 matches
Mail list logo