The simplest explanation is probably the correct one: it is not on the
classpath.
This class is to be found in the jersey-server-1.3.jar is that jar on the
classpath? (or in jersey-client-1.3.jar, either will do)
The simplest way one might be fooled into not including it in the classpath
is due
Thanks Tobias, I dont believe I have this on my runtime classpath, I'll include
it now.
From: tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:06:51 +0200
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] CNFE in Neo4j Server
The simplest explanation is probably the correct one: it
That would be EXCLUDE_AND_PRUNE.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Dario Rexin dario.re...@xing.com wrote:
Hi Peter, yes that would be not to include the path in the result set.
On 07.04.2011, at 07:01, Peter Neubauer
peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Dario,
I am not quite sure I
INCLUDE_AND_CONTINUE
the path will be included in the result set and the traversal will
go further down that path
INCLUDE_AND_PRUNE
the path will be included in the result set, but the traversal
will continue from that path
EXCLUDE_AND_CONTINUE
the path won't be included in the result
Sory, I meant
INCLUDE_AND_PRUNE
the path will be included in the result set, but the traversal
won't go further down that path, but will continue down other paths
that haven't been pruned
--
Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com]
Hacker, Neo Technology
www.neotechnology.com
+1
/purbon
2011/4/7 Michael Hunger michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
Thomas and I will do it on the evening of Sunday, April 17th, the day
before I leave for Malmö this month.
The party is to be held in the lots of different beer pub Aufsturz,
http://www.aufsturz.de/, oranienburger str.
You'd have to do the filtering/pruning in an evaluator, but the
sub-pathing afterwards, like:
for ( Path path : description.traverse(...) )
{
path = subPath( path, 2 );
}
private Path subPath( Path source, int from )
{
if ( source.length() from )
Hi guys,
Dario and I are working together on this, so let me clarify, what we want to
achieve. An example query in a friend network would be:
Retrieve a set of people P that are the direct friends of person A. P should
include only those friends that are also on a path between A and another
user
2011/4/7 Stephan Hagemann stephan.hagem...@googlemail.com:
Hi guys,
Dario and I are working together on this, so let me clarify, what we want to
achieve. An example query in a friend network would be:
Retrieve a set of people P that are the direct friends of person A. P should
include only
I think the confusing thing here is that ReturnableEvaluator talked about
including/excluding nodes
whereas when describing the Evaluations you spoke about including/excluding
paths.
Which of those is correct ?
Cheers
Michael
Am 07.04.2011 um 10:40 schrieb Mattias Persson:
2011/4/7 Stephan
If they are indeed equivalent, Michael is right - then I was confused by the
doc talking about nodes vs the other talking about paths.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:43, Michael Hunger
michael.hun...@neotechnology.com wrote:
I think the confusing thing here is that ReturnableEvaluator talked about
2011/4/7 Michael Hunger michael.hun...@neotechnology.com:
I think the confusing thing here is that ReturnableEvaluator talked about
including/excluding nodes
whereas when describing the Evaluations you spoke about including/excluding
paths.
Oh, sorry... one major difference from the old
Hi,
the subject says is all. :-) But anyway, is it possible/safe to use the
brand new 3.1 (31 March 2011) release of Lucene with neo4j?
Thanks,
---
balazs
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
2011/4/7 Stephan Hagemann stephan.hagem...@googlemail.com:
Thanks for clearing that up!
Then I can come back to my initial comment. If the Evaluator returns paths
and we are looking for nodes (sets of nodes to be specific), we have no easy
mechanism that will ensure we do not return duplicate
I see no reason for it not to work, Lucene has a good story of compatibility
between releases with the same major version.
But please note that this isn't something Neo Technology would officially
support (yet), so from that point of view you'd be on your own.
-t
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:16
Ok, thanks. I will try and report if I find out something (good or bad).
---
balazs
On 4/7/11 11:44 AM, Tobias Ivarsson wrote:
I see no reason for it not to work, Lucene has a good story of compatibility
between releases with the same major version.
But please note that this isn't something
Thanks, that will help! Iwill try defining my own uniqueness criteria.
Oh, so if any node in the path has been returned in any other path
before if (except the start node) then exclude it? That's the first
time I've heard that requirement. Love the fact that you sent a
picture, guys :)
Thanks. I was trying to use the jar target rather than install.
That build fails with:
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.neo4j.com.TestCommunication
Thu Apr 07 10:53:14 EDT 2011: MadeUpServer
The failures you are seeing are for tests that deal with large data. They
thus need a large heap configuration to succeed.
For specifying such settings for maven you would use the MAVEN_OPTS
environment variable, something like:
export MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1G
Cheers,
Tobias
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at
Hey,
As subject, is there anywhere I can get Neo4j or Neo Technology logos in
vector image format (ps, eps, pdf, svg)?
I'll be using them in a few posters at work, for the SICS open day. They
will be advertising past and ongoing Neo Technology related research.
A lot of people from industry will
I did this a bit ago and it might help start you off:
http://will.tip.dhappy.org/image/logo/Neo4j/
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Alex Averbuch alex.averb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey,
As subject, is there anywhere I can get Neo4j or Neo Technology logos in
vector image format (ps, eps, pdf,
Thanks Will!
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Will Holcomb w...@dhappy.org wrote:
I did this a bit ago and it might help start you off:
http://will.tip.dhappy.org/image/logo/Neo4j/
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Alex Averbuch alex.averb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
As subject, is there
Any plans to officially test Lucene 3.1 for Neo 1.3 GA?
There are plenty of useful things and bug fixes in Lucene 3.1.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:45 AM
To:
Does anyone have any experience using Solr with Neo4J?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
I've had moderate success tying Solr into Neo4J using an custom
UpdateRequestProcessor:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
With this, I'm able to intercept incoming documents and update a graph
to keep everything in sync. In my case, Solr is my primary system of
record and I'm
1.3 is frozen, nothing new is going in until the 1.4 line.
-tobias
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Rick Bullotta
rick.bullo...@thingworx.comwrote:
Any plans to officially test Lucene 3.1 for Neo 1.3 GA?
There are plenty of useful things and bug fixes in Lucene 3.1.
-Original
Nice!
Also, I think Andreas Kollegger has been doing Vector Magic with the
logo lately?
/peter
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alex Averbuch alex.averb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Will!
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Will Holcomb w...@dhappy.org wrote:
I did this a bit ago and it might help
All,
also, Patrick O'Leary has contributed an initial Solr indexing
approach that is still at
https://svn.neo4j.org/laboratory/components/solr/ . You could check it
out and update it and report back on what you think!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
28 matches
Mail list logo
