Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j and Java 1.5

2011-05-16 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
The service code was written before Java 1.5 support was dropped, so that will still work. There are a few other places where we use java 6 APIs, mainly java.util.Queue and java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit. javax.scripting is super simple to support under 1.5 (there is a backport package), and it is

[Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
There has been a few discussions around supporting Loops, relationships with the same start node as end node, recently. Both here on the mailing list, and even more at the Neo Technology office. We have a working patch for handling loops in Neo4j, but one final piece is missing: what should the

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, I say option 1. Marko. On May 16, 2011 8:12 AM, Tobias Ivarsson tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com wrote: There has been a few discussions around supporting Loops, relationships with the same start node as end node, recently. Both here on the mailing list, and even more at the Neo

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Adriano Henrique de Almeida
I agree with Marko. In fact, I'd say that if you can choose more than one option, I'd go with option 1 and 2. The option one when you're not sure you're creating a loop (not sure if the end node will be the start node), so in order to avoid ifs on the client code, option 1 will go for it. If

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Pablo Pareja
Hi, definitely +1 for option 1 Pablo On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Adriano Henrique de Almeida adrianoalmei...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with Marko. In fact, I'd say that if you can choose more than one option, I'd go with option 1 and 2. The option one when you're not sure you're

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Andres Taylor
+1 on the +1 for option 1 On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Hi, definitely +1 for option 1 Pablo ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Anders Nawroth
I'll go with option 1 as well. /anders On 05/16/2011 03:16 PM, Jim Webber wrote: And a +1 to option 1 from me as well. Jim On 16 May 2011, at 14:08, Andres Taylor wrote: +1 on the +1 for option 1 On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Parejappar...@era7.com wrote: Hi, definitely

Re: [Neo4j] Spring Data Graph in an OSGi environment

2011-05-16 Thread Jean-Pierre Bergamin
This could be the problem, yes. The repository factories that create the repositories from the interface definitions would need to import the domain specific packages that contain the interfaces to have access to them - which requires buddy loading. It seems as if the CGLIB enhanced class

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Rick Bullotta
+1 for option 1. -Original Message- From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:12 AM To: Neo user discussions Subject: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed There has been a

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Axel Morgner
+1 for 1 too Am 16.05.2011 14:11, schrieb Tobias Ivarsson: What do you think? ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Paul Bandler
+1 for 1 Sent from my iPhone On 16 May 2011, at 14:32, Rick Bullotta rick.bullo...@thingworx.com wrote: +1 for option 1. -Original Message- From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:12 AM

Re: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed

2011-05-16 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
Does anyone NOT planning to use loops have an opinion in the matter? That would be very valuable input. Cheers, -- Tobias Ivarsson tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com Cellphone: +46 706 534857 ___ Neo4j

Re: [Neo4j] finding nodes between two nodes

2011-05-16 Thread Mattias Persson
Please direct your questions (other than those with attachments) to the list so that more people can chime in! 2011/5/13 Noppanit Charassinvichai noppani...@gmail.com Hi Mattias, Thanks again for the reply and I'm trying to do the first suggestion. This is the code that I'm playing with

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4J-Spatial Delete Note Exception

2011-05-16 Thread Peter Neubauer
Deniz, just pushed a change and test that should fix this, https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j-spatial/commit/b44f55b5bd94dc2c6b9f1f5db9d3c13575ae9dc4 Could you try it out? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4J-Spatial Delete Note Exception

2011-05-16 Thread Deniz Demir
Hi Peter, I had fixed it by removing the bounding box property if there were no chid nodes but your fix works too. Thank you for help. Deniz On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Deniz, just pushed a change and test that should fix this,