Hi folks,
we are very busy with the upcoming release of the Neo4j-RC (hopefully
to be 1.0) so the response on the list might be a bit slow. Don't
despair, we will pick up the threads again very soon!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype
That's strange, let me have a look at it... I'll try such an example
and see if I can figure out why it isn't working!
2010/1/12 Zerony Zhao bw.li...@gmail.com:
Thanks for your reply.
Since I am trying to search a range of integer, index.getNodes( someKey,
[0 TO 1] ) will returns node with
There's some classes I usually use (fits me, since I wrote them :) ).
They are in https://svn.neo4j.org/laboratory/users/mattias/neo-test-fw/
2010/1/12 Raul Raja Martinez raulr...@gmail.com:
Anybody care to share a strategy or base classes for unit testing
operations in the graph?
Although they use the neo component, they should be updated to use
the neo4j-kernel component... I'll fix soon
2010/1/12 Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com:
There's some classes I usually use (fits me, since I wrote them :) ).
They are in
Your code doesn't need to be littered with transaction management. You
can have a very big MVC (Model-View-Controller) application or
something like that and _only_ have transaction handling in one
place... in the Controller.
See http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Transactions#Best_practices (page
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Ryan Levering rrlever...@gmail.com wrote:
...
very cumbersome. In addition, my profiling shows that a lot of
program time is being spent on transaction management in very simple
reading code.
There is a small overhead of managing read only transactions.
Hi,
Now we have a solution on numeric searching. Would someone comment on
leading wildcard ubstring search such as *foo* using
LuceneFulltextQueryIndexService? Any easy way to do this?
Zerony
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Peter Neubauer
peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Zerony and
Thanks, that is helpful!
2010/1/12 Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com:
There's some classes I usually use (fits me, since I wrote them :) ).
They are in https://svn.neo4j.org/laboratory/users/mattias/neo-test-fw/
2010/1/12 Raul Raja Martinez raulr...@gmail.com:
Anybody care to share a
Hello,
Neo4j 1.0-rc (release candidate) has just been uploaded.
This release only contains renaming stuff compared to the previous b11
release. There was a mail about this on the list a few days ago but
for those of you who missed it here is an overview:
o neo component renamed to neo4j-kernel
Hello everyone,
I just converted Gremlin [ http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com ] over to Neo4j
1.0-rc. This is what my POM looks like:
dependency
groupIdorg.neo4j/groupId
artifactIdneo4j-kernel/artifactId
version1.0-rc/version
/dependency
I am a bit disappointed that it took the Gremlin community all of 23
minutes to update.
;)
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter
Then this wouldn't be M-V-C, it would be M/C-V. The point of having
that separate layer is that you don't need to worry about the model
abstraction. Generally, controller level transactions should only
exist because you actually want to force multi-operation atomicity,
not because you
While that is true, most MVC I have seen use separate POJO for view-
controller communication, like an javabean or an action bean in
Struts. Generally these are simpler, disconnected objects. But if
you didn't separate the view and controller well, your view layer
would have to worry
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Levering rrlever...@gmail.com wrote:
Then this wouldn't be M-V-C, it would be M/C-V. The point of having
that separate layer is that you don't need to worry about the model
abstraction. Generally, controller level transactions should only
exist because
Lucene supports *something*, but not from the query syntax (how odd is
that?)... what you can do is to subclass
LuceneFulltextQueryIndexService and @Override the formQuery method
with something like:
@Override
protected Query formQuery( String key, Object value )
{
if ( value
Cool, er should have that on the wiki, too methinks.
/peter
Sent from my cellphone, please excuse typos and the gmail sender address.
On Jan 12, 2010 8:06 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
Lucene supports *something*, but not from the query syntax (how odd is
that?)... what
Yep you're right, that's mentioned in
http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Transactions#MVC_example as well
2010/1/12 Ryan Levering rrlever...@gmail.com:
While that is true, most MVC I have seen use separate POJO for view-
controller communication, like an javabean or an action bean in
Struts.
2010/1/12 Laurent Laborde kerdez...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Levering rrlever...@gmail.com wrote:
Then this wouldn't be M-V-C, it would be M/C-V. The point of having
that separate layer is that you don't need to worry about the model
abstraction. Generally, controller
I understand but imaging this case...
Model - Person encapsulates underlying node that access name property
Controller - Handler that receives http request requests a model has
transaction and delegates the model to a template to be rendered
View - Template that gets rendered with domain objects
19 matches
Mail list logo
