IndexProvider provider = new LuceneIndexProvider( graphDb );
RelationshipIndex index = provider.relationshipIndex( myIndex,
LuceneIndexProvider.EXACT_CONFIG );
2010/8/16 Jeff Klann jkl...@iupui.edu
Hey I thought I'd try this out. Got the new kernel and downloaded the new
index component
Very cool Paddy,
seems things are progressing at your end! If you could remove previous
routes and markers when clicking on new information it would
de-clutter the UI considerably ...
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Hi,
unfortunately I had to step aside from this subject for some days and
now I'm trying to catch up with all your suggestions.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Niels Hoogeveen
pd_aficion...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to encode the absence of a relationship with a relationship in
Hi Craig,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Craig Taverner cr...@amanzi.com wrote:
I think leveraging existing relationships is obviously valuable, but I
thought I'd throw in an idea for doing the original suggestion, pure random
search:
Sounds interesting. I think the way to go is to
Hi David,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:35 AM, David Montag
david.mon...@neotechnology.com wrote:
Alberto,
Hope your testing is coming along well. Feel free to post your progress to
the list!
David
Unfortunately I had to leave this subject on the side for some days
and now I'm catching up. I
Hi Mattias,
Yes, I think that might be you I was referring to. I'll post any ideas or
questions I have to the mailing list as you suggested.
Todd
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Limit meaning in this run? Or at all times? The first is ok, the
second not. I guess you mean exiting after I have computed already 10
new relationships right?
Well, actually I was aiming for an algorithm that would converge on a stable
state. This means, if no new information is being added
Hi Craig,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Craig Taverner cr...@amanzi.com wrote:
Limit meaning in this run? Or at all times? The first is ok, the
second not. I guess you mean exiting after I have computed already 10
new relationships right?
Well, actually I was aiming for an algorithm
Sounds good to me!
2010/8/18 Todd Chaffee t...@mikamai.com
Hi Mattias,
Yes, I think that might be you I was referring to. I'll post any ideas or
questions I have to the mailing list as you suggested.
Todd
___
Neo4j mailing list
I think I fixed it now
2010/8/18 Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
Niels, Mattias,
I just refactored the maven site to load snippets from actually
running code via Tobias' awesome maven hack, see
https://svn.neo4j.org/components/meta-model/trunk/src/site/apt/index.apt
.
Mmm we cannot limit the number of relationships in this app. One the
most important features
is that we'll keep looking for good matches for the user.
Since the trimming algorithm will entirely delete low scoring relationships,
the search algorithm will also keep finding them again, and if
Hi!
I have a very stupid question...
Is it ensured that a relationship between two Nodes stays a singleton, even
if another relationship of the same type and direction is added between
those Nodes?
Sometimes I get strange results when I delete nodes, that's why I ask.
Thanks in advance and best
Hi,
Neo4j is a multi graph - there can exist multiple relationships between two
nodes even with the same type and direction. Each relationship has a unique
ID so you can tell them apart.
Whats your error message in detail?
cheers Martin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Marius Kubatz
Hi,
Regarding Neo4j project, is there any difference or priority about Sun-Java-6
or
OpenJDK?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
14 matches
Mail list logo
