Paul,
yeah, that discussion is still on, but I fear the workload constraints
on Mattias and Tobias are preventing it right now. In a few weeks
things are easing up again, which will open the door for a number of
things that should be done. However, feel free to prototype this in
the lab, dunno if any practical work already is done already ...
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Paul A. Jackson paul.jack...@pb.com wrote:
I have a program for loading data into a graph and would like to support the
case where later records contain data for nodes that were defined in prior
records. In some cases it is possible that a later record may indicate that
a node's property should be null where earlier it was given a value. This
causes me to wish I had the removeIndex methods that I have in the
non-batch-inserting version of LuceneIndex.
Am I out of luck?
I recall an earlier discussion where consideration was being given to a
version of the batch inserter that implemented the GraphDatabaseService and
LuceneIndexService interfaces. Did anything come of that?
Thanks,
-Paul
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user