Jose,
Cual es tu pregunta en espa~nol? Yo puedo traducir por ti.
Parece que estas preguntado cual es el modelo que neo4j usa, pero no
entendemos a lo que te refieres.
El modelo es cualquier cosa que puedes modelar con simple puntos y
relaciones. Los puntos pueden ser de cualqier forma (con tal
Andrea Taylor
sorry by my english, realy is bad.
My quetion is,
What is the data model that use neo4j or your specification.
thanks you very much.
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
I was thinking the same thing, but 60 seconds is an awfully long garbage
collection cycle...
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Andreas Kollegger
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:15 PM
To: Neo4j user discussions
Subjec
Do you have some nodes in your dataset which has loads of relationships?
Because if that's the case then the slow query could possible hit one or
more of those "heavy" nodes.
Also are you using breadth first traversal from one direction or from both
directions (both directions being much more effi
It's possible that you're seeing a GC spike. Would you mind adding GC
monitoring[1] to your output to see if that is related?
Best,
Andreas
[1]
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/gc-tuning-5-138395.html#0.0.0.Measurement%7Coutline
On Nov 16, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> My fir
My first guess with that big a difference would be a bug in the
calculation/output of the benchmark timing!
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Martin Grimmer
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:47 AM
To: user@lists.neo4j.
Hey,
Is it the exact same query?
If not, it would be interesting to know how many Relations and Nodes have
been traversed.
Depending on graph topology this can differ a lot.
cheers Martin Neumann
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Martin Grimmer
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> currently we evaluate Neo4j f
Hello,
currently we evaluate Neo4j for one of our projects.
Our tests showed some strange behaviour to us:
...
at query 941/1000 (0,009410) with 1809 mb in 0,30 seconds -
avg: 0,308696 - max: 54,533000
at query 942/1000 (0,009420) with 1809 mb in 0,069000 seconds -
8 matches
Mail list logo