[Neo4j] 回复： Fans of Neo4j From Chinese

Ok, thx . That's help me a lot. Gtalk: houbo...@gmail.com skype: bolin.hou -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Tobias Ivarssontobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com; 发送时间: 2011年3月19日(星期六) 下午5:59 收件人: Neo4j user discussionsuser@lists.neo4j.org; 主题: Re: [Neo4j] Fans of Neo4j From

Re: [Neo4j] Finding a Path Between Nodes (filtered by relationship property)

Add Something like: return filter: { language: javascript, body: position.lastRelationship().hasProperty(\userGroupId\) position.lastRelationship().getProperty(\userGroupId\) == 111;}}) to your traversal. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Kevin Dieter kevin.die...@megree.com wrote: Hi, I am

Re: [Neo4j] Graph traversal doubt

Hi, In Gremlin do, g.v(torontoId).inE('traveled_to').outV.outE('traveled_to').inV If you want it ranked by frequency, do: m = [:]; g.v(torontoId).inE('traveled_to').outV.outE('traveled_to').inV.groupCount(m) Take care, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Mar 20,

[Neo4j] Possible performance regression issue?

Here's the quick summary of what we're encountering: We are inserting large numbers of activity stream entries on a nearly constant basis. To optimize transactioning, we queue these up and have a single scheduled task that reads the entries from the queue and persists them to Neo. Within

[Neo4j] New Blog post: Strategies for Scaling Neo4j

With especial thanks to Mark Harwood and Alex Averbuch, I wrote this on approaches for scaling: http://jim.webber.name/2011/03/22/ef4748c3-6459-40b6-bcfa-818960150e0f.aspx Your thoughts would be most welcome. Jim ___ Neo4j mailing list

Re: [Neo4j] Fans of Neo4j From Chinese

I'd like to explore this question a bit further. Does this mean that basically there's no way to scale beyond a single thread/CPU for disconnected graphs if you have complex graph dependencies (e.g. you cannot create disjoint subgraphs)? -Original Message- From:

Re: [Neo4j] New Blog post: Strategies for Scaling Neo4j

Great post. Only thing I'd add is that a weakness of 1 2 is that while they scale ~linearly for reads, they don't scale writes. Maybe that's obvious but it may be worth pointing out anyway. Cheers, -EE On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 17:47, Jim Webber j...@neotechnology.com wrote: With especial

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j and Microsoft Azure

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 17:15, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Hi all Graphytes, there has been a lot of interest in Neo4j fro the Microsoft side of things, so Magnus Mårtensson and me did write-up o how to get a first version of a Neo4j Server hosted on Microsoft Azure.

Re: [Neo4j] New Blog post: Strategies for Scaling Neo4j

Duly updated, thanks for the feedback. Jim On 22 Mar 2011, at 00:56, Emil Eifrem wrote: Great post. Only thing I'd add is that a weakness of 1 2 is that while they scale ~linearly for reads, they don't scale writes. Maybe that's obvious but it may be worth pointing out anyway. Cheers,

[Neo4j] 回复： Fans of Neo4j From Chinese

OK, thanks for you help! It help me a lot! There is another question , In my application, there are lots of nodes and relations(May be million nodes,and ten Thousands relation). I am wonder, I have a method to take relation less,but the nodes will be more( the same ratio ), Is it faster or

[Neo4j] 回复： 回复： Fans of Neo4j From Chinese

Sorry, I have not take it clear, my node have many relations, the relations will be more and more than the nodes, I say ten thousands relations is one node connect to another :) -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Rick Bullottarick.bullo...@thingworx.com; 发送时间: 2011年3月22日(星期二)

Re: [Neo4j] Performance expectations for Neo4j.

Bård, sorry, this seems to have slipped through the list. I think you should be able to attach a picture to the list. Let me know if you have problems with that! Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk:      neubauer.peter Skype       peter.neubauer Phone       +46 704 106975 LinkedIn