Thank you Peter for pointing this out. As we need a concept for
permissions anyway, this comes in very handy. :-)
Ideas from such an ACL implementation will also help us, modelling our
fault tree.
Best regards,
James
2011/5/13 Peter Neubauer :
> Jean-Pierre,
> this looks a lot like the deduction
Noppanit,
what kind of language are you most familiar with? There are Neo4j Server
plugins for Gremlin (Groovy based) and Java (core Neo4j API) that let you
have more fine grained control over the traversals. Look at
https://github.com/peterneubauer/gremlin-translation-plugin and
http://docs.neo4j
Hi Jennifer,
Could you reproduce it on your side by doing the same kind of systems tests
again? If you could then I'd be very happy if you could try a patched
version that we have been working on and see if that fixes the issue.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Jennifer Hickey wr
Hi Tobias,
Unfortunately I don't have an isolated test case, as I was doing a fairly
involved system test at the time. I may be able to have a colleague work on
reproducing it at a later date (I've been diverted to something else for the
moment).
I was remote debugging with Eclipse, so I tog
We are not going to use loops, but would still vote for #1. Checking against
loops seems more like a business logic responsibility that Neo4j clients should
be responsible for.
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Ivarsson [mailto:tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 201
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> Von: Andy Clement
> Datum: 17. Mai 2011 01:48:58 MESZ
> An: Michael Hunger
> Betreff: Fwd: [Neo4j] Spring Data Graph in an OSGi environment (error while
> AJ-enhancing the config file)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I heard back from Glyn. See below.
>
> cheers
>
Hi Peter,
I had fixed it by removing the bounding box property if there were no chid
nodes but your fix works too.
Thank you for help.
Deniz
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Peter Neubauer <
peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> Deniz,
> just pushed a change and test that should fix this
Deniz,
just pushed a change and test that should fix this,
https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j-spatial/commit/b44f55b5bd94dc2c6b9f1f5db9d3c13575ae9dc4
Could you try it out?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.
Please direct your questions (other than those with attachments) to the list
so that more people can chime in!
2011/5/13 Noppanit Charassinvichai
> Hi Mattias,
>
> Thanks again for the reply and I'm trying to do the first suggestion. This
> is the code that I'm playing with
>
> curl -H Accept:ap
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:11, Tobias Ivarsson
wrote:
> 1. let the existing createRelationshipTo(Node,RelationshipType) create loops
> if the same node is passed as argument.
+ 1 option 1.
--
Javier de la Rosa
http://versae.es
___
Neo4j mailing list
Does anyone NOT planning to use loops have an opinion in the matter?
That would be very valuable input.
Cheers,
--
Tobias Ivarsson
Hacker, Neo Technology
www.neotechnology.com
Cellphone: +46 706 534857
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https:
+1 for 1
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 May 2011, at 14:32, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> +1 for option 1.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
> Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:12 AM
> To: Neo user discussio
+1 for 1 too
Am 16.05.2011 14:11, schrieb Tobias Ivarsson:
> What do you think?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
+1 for option 1.
-Original Message-
From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On
Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:12 AM
To: Neo user discussions
Subject: [Neo4j] Color suggestions for the Self-Relationship bike shed
There has been a fe
This could be the problem, yes. The "repository factories" that create
the repositories from the interface definitions would need to import
the domain specific packages that contain the interfaces to have
access to them - which requires buddy loading.
It seems as if the CGLIB enhanced class
org.sp
I'll go with option 1 as well.
/anders
On 05/16/2011 03:16 PM, Jim Webber wrote:
> And a +1 to option 1 from me as well.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On 16 May 2011, at 14:08, Andres Taylor wrote:
>
>> +1 on the +1 for option 1
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Pareja wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> defin
And a +1 to option 1 from me as well.
Jim
On 16 May 2011, at 14:08, Andres Taylor wrote:
> +1 on the +1 for option 1
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Pareja wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> definitely +1 for option 1
>>
>> Pablo
> ___
> Neo4j mail
+1 on the +1 for option 1
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Pareja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> definitely +1 for option 1
>
> Pablo
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Hi,
definitely +1 for option 1
Pablo
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Adriano Henrique de Almeida <
adrianoalmei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Marko.
>
> In fact, I'd say that if you can choose more than one option, I'd go with
> option 1 and 2. The option one when you're not sure you're
I agree with Marko.
In fact, I'd say that if you can choose more than one option, I'd go with
option 1 and 2. The option one when you're not sure you're creating a loop
(not sure if the end node will be the start node), so in order to avoid ifs
on the client code, option 1 will go for it. If you'r
Hi,
I say option 1.
Marko.
On May 16, 2011 8:12 AM, "Tobias Ivarsson" <
tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
There has been a few discussions around supporting Loops, relationships with
the same start node as end node, recently. Both here on the mailing list,
and even more at the Neo Techn
There has been a few discussions around supporting Loops, relationships with
the same start node as end node, recently. Both here on the mailing list,
and even more at the Neo Technology office.
We have a working patch for handling loops in Neo4j, but one final piece is
missing: what should the AP
The service code was written before Java 1.5 support was dropped, so that
will still work.
There are a few other places where we use java 6 APIs, mainly
java.util.Queue and java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit. javax.scripting is super
simple to support under 1.5 (there is a backport package), and it is
23 matches
Mail list logo
