Anyone?
Also whats the current status of neo4j.py? I read somewhere it was being
updated some time ago.
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/neo4j-py-install-problems-tp3191386p3194919.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing
Eddy,
Jake is working on it right now, what is the state Jake?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
http://www.neo4j.org
Hi Pieter,
Jim recently added support for paging in the Neo4j server for traversals,
For Cypher, there is SKIP and LIMIT, together acting as a kind of
paging system, but executing the query again (just giving you a
different chunk of the result), so I am not sure that works for your
case.
Hi there,
yes, nested transactions are really using the most topmost transaction
for control, so your assessment if the commit semantics is right (I
think). Talked to Tobias about this, and maybe we could state this
more clearly in the docs. Got any good working we could change to?
Feel free to
Btw,
the pages traverser is convered here:
http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/rest-api-traverse.html#rest-api-creating-a-paged-traverser
Would love to see support throughout the whole REST API for it.
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone
Mmh,
you are looking not for the next node on a way but the nearest? In
that case, you maybe coudl index all OSM nodes in a new layer
ALL_NODES, then fish out the next node on the way, and do a search
for nodes closer that this and check if they are on your way?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk:
Sulabh,
if you want to get the property relationships, I would either get
these during the iteration of the nodes you get back (thus in some way
duplicating the Evaluator in the result iteration, but you could
possibly refactor that into one method), or during the traversal build
up a resultset
Thanks Mattias. The way I understand what you said is, that swapping `one`
and `two` in *finder.findSinglePath( one, two );* should yield the same
timing when Direction.BOTH is used; this would be great. But I don't see how
this is possible (due to not knowing how it's stored too) unless you know
Hey Peter,
Got any good working we could change to?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, do you mean that if I have any good
text to add to the javadoc so it's stated more clearly ? or something
related to code instead? but if code, to do what?
I understand that they are using the topmost
What I'm saying is that:
one -- two(one,two) for OUTGOING
and
two -- one (two,one) for INCOMING
should yield the same timing.
2011/7/24 John cyuczieekc cyuczie...@gmail.com
Thanks Mattias. The way I understand what you said is, that swapping `one`
and `two` in
Thanks John for the details!
As for the GIThub workflow:
http://www.eqqon.com/index.php/Collaborative_Github_Workflow
and http://help.github.com/
are good starting points!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn
but, even when `one` has 1 million outgoing rels
and `two` has 10 or 11 incoming rels
cool then ;) I was trying to say the same thing ...
Have a nice day,
John.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Mattias Persson
matt...@neotechnology.comwrote:
What I'm saying is that:
one -- two(one,two)
Are you sure this is true, Mattias?The response time of a getRelationship call
depends on the total number of relationships on the node. So it makes a
difference which side of the relationship makes the call. It is always faster
to ask it from the side that has the lowest total number of
It doesn't matter since the algorithm is bi-directional... so:
one -- two
will start from one OUTGOING and two INCOMING, whereas
two -- one
will start from two INCOMING and one OUTGOING see, no difference.
It alternates side for each relationship. It will, however depend on where
updated to latest from github, Stops the algo as soon as possible in
findSinglePath
graphdb contains:
one--three
one--{ a million other random nodes }
one--two
{ 10 random nodes } -- two
(added in that order, except that `one--two` is somewhere between those 10
random nodes)
output:
with
ok fully reverting the entire project worked (that is without that fix):
with Direction.BOTH:
(one)--(three) 8,438 ms
(one)--(two) 873 ms
(three)--(one) 0 ms
(two)--(one) 0 ms
(one)--(three) 734 ms
(one)--(two) 743 ms
(three)--(one) 0 ms
(two)--(one) 0 ms
(one)--(three) 784 ms
(one)--(two) 621 ms
==Weekly Report==
Hi all,
this week I studied the uDig tutorials and uDig code to learn how to use the
renderers.
I made some experiments about OSM data import and editing using JOSM and
Potlatch2.
Now I'm trying to find a way to edit OSM data directly from uDig and a way
to commit (save) the
I got more creative with the naming and formatting, and I post another
output (more intuitively read), the graphdb contains (rels added in this
order):
ROOT_LIST--START
ROOT_LIST--{ 500,000 new unique nodes }
ROOT_LIST--MIDDLE
ROOT_LIST--{ another set of 500,000 new unique nodes }
ROOT_LIST--END
Hi,
For Cypher, there is SKIP and LIMIT, together acting as a kind of
paging system, but executing the query again (just giving you a
different chunk of the result), so I am not sure that works for your
case. http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/cypher-query-lang.html.
Gremlin supports
Jörg,
there where several issues Toni and me found when looking at your
example. Thanks a lot!
First of all, Pax Exam Player using the built-in native OSGi Runner is
not emulating the real platform classloading correctly. Toni is at
this one, the tests are switched to the PaxRunner instead,
Hi all Graphistas.
if there is anyone out at OSCON tomorrow, maybe we could meet up at
5.30pm or so ta the Android Happy hour?
Let me know, would be cool to have a beer or two :)
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn
Today I wrote a piece about the Enhanced API and about HyperRelationships, I
have been working on over the last couple of days.
See: https://github.com/peterneubauer/graph-collections/wiki/Enhanced-API
The API as presented in the graph-collections repo on Git is not feature
complete yet with
How do I set it up?
Thanks!
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
New to graphs? FYI http://mlg.ucd.ie/summer
Tim McNamara
Professional \\ paperlessprojects.com
Personal \\ @timClicks | timmcnamara.co.nz
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Hello,
Which is the best library for using Neo4j from Clojure?
This fork:
https://github.com/wagjo/borneo
Seems active, and maintained.
Any advice or pointers would be appreciated.
Don
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
25 matches
Mail list logo