Re: [Neo] Storage overhead

2008-06-23 Thread Johan Svensson
Did you shutdown Neo so logical log got removed? Check the Neo store
directory for a nioneo_logical.log*. If that file exist you didn't
perform a proper shutdown so a lot of information about how to recover
is also stored not reflecting the real overhead.

Default configuration of Neo is not optimized to store large chunks of
binary data instead it is tweaked to handle small arrays and strings
efficiently. The overhead should be somewhere around 30% but can be
reduced by changing block size for the array store.

-Johan

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:09 PM, David Montag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi everyone,

 I am thinking about storing binary data in Neo. When I ran some simple
 tests, there seemed to be considerable amounts of overhead. For example,
 when I stored 10MB of data (byte[10*1024*1024]) in a node property, var/nio
 increased in size from 3MB to 18MB. Does anybody have an explanation for
 this increase in disk usage? Does anyone have any other suggestions on how
 to store binary data in Neo?

 /David
 ___
 Neo mailing list
 User@lists.neo4j.org
 https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user


[Neo] Storage overhead

2008-06-22 Thread David Montag
Hi everyone,

I am thinking about storing binary data in Neo. When I ran some simple
tests, there seemed to be considerable amounts of overhead. For example,
when I stored 10MB of data (byte[10*1024*1024]) in a node property, var/nio
increased in size from 3MB to 18MB. Does anybody have an explanation for
this increase in disk usage? Does anyone have any other suggestions on how
to store binary data in Neo?

/David
___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user