Re: [Neo4j] HA Consistency

2011-08-23 Thread Peter Neubauer
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency To: Neo4j user discussions user@lists.neo4j.org Message-ID: 4d3381ef-89dc-402f-9efe-77d72131e...@portalify.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Aug 19, 2011, at 07:57 , David Rader wrote: It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual

Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency

2011-08-19 Thread Tuure Laurinolli
On Aug 19, 2011, at 07:57 , David Rader wrote: It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable by how often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes. With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply use sticky sessions on clients to

Re: [Neo4j] HA Consistency

2011-08-19 Thread David Rader
. slave.neocluster.company.com or such? Thanks Dave Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:12:05 +0300 From: Tuure Laurinolli tuure.laurino...@portalify.com Subject: Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency To: Neo4j user discussions user@lists.neo4j.org Message-ID: 4d3381ef-89dc-402f-9efe-77d72131e...@portalify.com Content-Type

[Neo4j] HA consistency

2011-08-18 Thread David Rader
It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable by how often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes. With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply use sticky sessions on clients to ensure that immediate reads of updated data are served by