Subject: Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency
To: Neo4j user discussions user@lists.neo4j.org
Message-ID: 4d3381ef-89dc-402f-9efe-77d72131e...@portalify.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Aug 19, 2011, at 07:57 , David Rader wrote:
It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual
On Aug 19, 2011, at 07:57 , David Rader wrote:
It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable by
how often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes.
With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply use sticky
sessions on clients to
. slave.neocluster.company.com or such?
Thanks
Dave
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:12:05 +0300
From: Tuure Laurinolli tuure.laurino...@portalify.com
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency
To: Neo4j user discussions user@lists.neo4j.org
Message-ID: 4d3381ef-89dc-402f-9efe-77d72131e...@portalify.com
Content-Type
It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable by how
often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes.
With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply use sticky
sessions on clients to ensure that immediate reads of updated data are served
by
4 matches
Mail list logo