There seems to be no Hadoop implementation of ParallelSGDFactorizer.
>> ALSWRFactorizer has a Hadoop implementation.
>>
>> ParallelSGDFactorizer (since it is based on stochastic gradient
>> descent) is much faster than ALSWRFactorizer.
>>
>> I don't kno
> >
>> > On 07.09.2013 19:08, Tevfik Aytekin wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> There seems to be no Hadoop implementation of ParallelSGDFactorizer.
>> >> ALSWRFactorizer has a Hadoop implementation.
>> >>
>> >> ParallelSGDFactorizer (
; wrote:
> > IIRC the algorithm behind ParallelSGDFactorizer needs shared memory,
> > which is not given in a shared-nothing environment.
> >
> >
> > On 07.09.2013 19:08, Tevfik Aytekin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> There seems to be no Hadoop impl
There seems to be no Hadoop implementation of ParallelSGDFactorizer.
>> ALSWRFactorizer has a Hadoop implementation.
>>
>> ParallelSGDFactorizer (since it is based on stochastic gradient
>> descent) is much faster than ALSWRFactorizer.
>>
>> I don't kno
IIRC the algorithm behind ParallelSGDFactorizer needs shared memory,
which is not given in a shared-nothing environment.
On 07.09.2013 19:08, Tevfik Aytekin wrote:
> Hi,
> There seems to be no Hadoop implementation of ParallelSGDFactorizer.
> ALSWRFactorizer has a Hadoop imple
Hi,
There seems to be no Hadoop implementation of ParallelSGDFactorizer.
ALSWRFactorizer has a Hadoop implementation.
ParallelSGDFactorizer (since it is based on stochastic gradient
descent) is much faster than ALSWRFactorizer.
I don't know Hadoop much. But it seems to me that a H
