Re: Help us review #MesosCon 2015 proposals

2015-02-21 Thread Dave Lester
Hi Tim, There's no magic number, but that's being discussed by the speaker subcommittee now and it's something the larger MesosCon program committee will need to decide in the coming weeks. The # of accepted talks will largely depend on the number of tracks we break into, and number of / length

Re: Spark on Mesos Submitted from multiple users

2015-02-21 Thread Timothy Chen
Hi John, Having drivers launched on the cluster where you can query/kill is what I'm currently working on. As for sharing drivers I will let others chime in if that ever makes sense. Tim On Feb 21, 2015, at 11:29 AM, John Omernik j...@omernik.com wrote: So in my instance, instead having

Re: Help us review #MesosCon 2015 proposals

2015-02-21 Thread Steve Domin
All of them look great indeed. Didn't reject any as well. I find the wording a bit annoying as I didn't really find any talk average, I just selected accept for the one I really want to hear about more than anything else. On Saturday, February 21, 2015, Pablo Delgado pabl...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Help us review #MesosCon 2015 proposals

2015-02-21 Thread Dave Lester
Thanks Steve and Pablo for the feedback. Regarding the system of rating proposals: this is similar to what we used last year, however last year we also had strongly accept and strongly reject options which in my personal opinion were helpful for determining the best-of-the-best. As a speaker