Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread Isabel Jimenez
Hi Adam, 1. Mesos Agent 2. Mesos Agent 3. No but is master-agent a logical coupling? 4. +1 Dave, documentation, then API, then rest of the code base. We should also make sure that we only have to change once and that we cover all the connotations that might offend. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:50

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread haosdent
Hi Adam, 1. Mesos Worker 2. Mesos Worker 3. No 4. Carefully. Should take care the compatible when upgrade. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Dave Lester d...@davelester.org wrote: Hi Adam, I've been using Master/Worker in presentations for the past 9 months and it hasn't led to any

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread Sharma Podila
My $0.02... The use of the word Worker is confusing. This entity has several responsibilities, including, maintaining connectivity to master, managing and monitoring the executors, sending status updates, and other future endeavors such as autonomously determining actions for resource

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread Paul Brett
-1 for the name change. The master/slave terms in Mesos accurately describe the relationship between the components using common engineering terms that predate modern computing. Human slavery is an abomination, but then so is murder. Would you have us eliminate all references to kill in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread Pradeep Kiruvale
1.Mesos Resource-Agent 2.mesos resource-Agent 3.Mesos Resource-Scheduler 4.Eventually Thanks Regards, Pradeep On 2 June 2015 at 15:39, Scott Rankin sran...@motus.com wrote: +1 1. Mesos Worker 2. mesos-worker 3. No 4. Change the docs as soon as the new command is

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread Scott Rankin
+1 1. Mesos Worker 2. mesos-worker 3. No 4. Change the docs as soon as the new command is available, perhaps provide a symlink for a while. From: Adam Bordelon Reply-To: user@mesos.apache.orgmailto:user@mesos.apache.org Date: Monday, June 1, 2015 at 5:18 PM To: dev,

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread Chris Aniszczyk
1) Mesos Worker 2) Mesos Worker 3) no, I'm OK with Mesos Master 4) announce the change as part of a new release and deprecate the old names publicly; this may also be a good time to consider crafting an official deprecation policy for the project so we're transparent with how deprecation will work

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread CCAAT
On 06/01/2015 04:18 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: There has been much discussion about finding a less offensive name than Slave, and many of these thoughts have been captured in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1478 I find political correctness rather nausiating. Folks should stop trying

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave

2015-06-02 Thread CCAAT
On 06/02/2015 11:30 AM, Alexander Gallego wrote: 1. mesos-worker 2. mesos-worker Currently, my (limited) understanding of the codebase for mesos, is that slave does not have any autonomy, is 100% controlled by the Master, hence the clear nomenclature of Master-Slave. If we are to migrate to