Re: Non-checkpointing frameworks

+1 to A and B Aurora has enabled checkpointing for years and requires operators to enable checkpointing on the slaves. On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > I'm in favor of A & B. I find it provides a better "first experience" to > users. > From

Re: Non-checkpointing frameworks

I'm in favor of A & B. I find it provides a better "first experience" to users. >From my experience you usually have to have an explicit reason to not want to checkpoint. Most people assume the semantics provided by the checkpoint behavior is default and it can be a frustrating experience for them

Re: On Mesos versioning and deprecation policy

Thanks @yan's great inputs! I couldn't agree more almost of them. > Also the API is not just what the machine reads but all the documentation associated with it, right? It depends on what the documentation says; what the user _should_ expect. I think different users may have different