On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 7:59 AM Vinod Kone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in another thread and in the committers sync, there seem to be
> heavy interest in moving our project repos ("mesos", "mesos-site") from the
> "git-wip" git server to the new "gitbox" server to better avail GitHub
>
I don’t have a big stake in, however, one opinion is if a large commercial
enterprise was using a specific release that is working the desire is often to
only upgrade if necessary. Necessary can be for a number of reasons including
new features; however if a new feature is not needed the
Unfortunately the time conflicts with the CSI community sync so I'll have
to skip :(
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:55 AM Abel Souza wrote:
> Thank you for setting this up Gaston,
>
> Would you mind giving us a brief of what you have in mind for discussion?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Abel
>
> On 07/17/2018
I just have a comment on a special case:
If a fix for a flaky test is easy to backport,
IMO we probably should backport it,
otherwise if someone backports another critical fix in the future,
it would take them extra effort to check all CI failures.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:39 AM Vinod Kone
+1
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Jie Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Schwartzmeyer <
> and...@schwartzmeyer.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/17/2018 8:54 am, Zhitao Li wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM James Peach wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
+1
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Schwartzmeyer <
and...@schwartzmeyer.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> On 07/17/2018 8:54 am, Zhitao Li wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM James Peach wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 17, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Vinod Kone wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As
+1
On 07/17/2018 8:54 am, Zhitao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM James Peach wrote:
>
>>> On Jul 17, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Vinod Kone wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As discussed in another thread and in the committers sync, there seem to be
>>> heavy interest in moving our
+1
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM James Peach wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed in another thread and in the committers sync, there seem to
> be heavy interest in moving our project repos ("mesos", "mesos-site") from
> the "git-wip"
> On Jul 17, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Vinod Kone wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in another thread and in the committers sync, there seem to be
> heavy interest in moving our project repos ("mesos", "mesos-site") from the
> "git-wip" git server to the new "gitbox" server to better avail GitHub
>
Hi,
As discussed in another thread and in the committers sync, there seem to be
heavy interest in moving our project repos ("mesos", "mesos-site") from the
"git-wip" git server to the new "gitbox" server to better avail GitHub
integrations.
Please vote +1, 0, -1 regarding the move to gitbox. The
Thank you for setting this up Gaston,
Would you mind giving us a brief of what you have in mind for discussion?
Thank you,
Abel
On 07/17/2018 10:52 AM, Matt Jarvis wrote:
That's great news Gaston ! Let me know if you need any help from the
Community team.
Matt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, 05:04
That's great news Gaston ! Let me know if you need any help from the
Community team.
Matt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, 05:04 Gastón Kleiman, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for responding to my previous emails - I think that we have
> quorum for a new working group!
>
> Many of you who have expressed
12 matches
Mail list logo
