to the whole task termination. By requiring two different objects
in the task launch message we motivate the framework ? i.e. framework
writer ? to be aware of different policies that may be attached to
different roles. Does it make sense?
?Alex
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Gidon Gershinsky gi
, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Gidon Gershinsky gi...@il.ibm.com
wrote:
Hi Alex,
Yep, this setup is using static reservations in agents.
I haven't tried running a big task with two or more resources (reserved
and unreserved), but guess it is quite intuitive for a developer - a
framework is offered two
I have a simple setup where a framework runs with a role, and some
resources are reserved in cluster for that role.
The resource offers arrive at the framework as a list of two resource
sets: one general (cpus(*)), etc) and one specific for the role
(cpus(role1), etc).
So far so good. If two
We need to develop a new resource allocation module, replacing the
off-the-shelf DRF.
As I understand, the current mechanism
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/allocation-module/
is being replaced with a less intrusive module architecture,
4 matches
Mail list logo