he cluster are equal and reach a consensus together about work
> distribution and so on?
>
>
> --------------
> *From:* Nikolay Borodachev [nbo...@adobe.com]
> *Sent:* 06 June 2015 04:34
> *To:* user@mesos.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: 答复: [DISCUSS] Renaming
June 2015 04:34
To: user@mesos.apache.org
Subject: RE: 答复: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave
+1 master/slave �C no need to change
From: Sam Salisbury [mailto:samsalisb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 8:31 AM
To: user@mesos.apache.org
Subject: Re: 答复: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave
Master/Min
+1 master/slave – no need to change
From: Sam Salisbury [mailto:samsalisb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 8:31 AM
To: user@mesos.apache.org
Subject: Re: 答复: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave
Master/Minion +1
On 5 June 2015 at 15:14, CCAAT
mailto:cc...@tampabay.rr.com>> wrote
James, I was indeed counting "master/slave, no change needed" as -1 for
Item 0, but left them out of the summary for Item 1.
Note that this is a [DISCUSS] thread, not a [VOTE] thread, so we're not
officially voting yet, just gathering ideas from the community. All I was
doing with the (manual) fuzz
+1 to what Adam wrote.
1. Mesos Worker [Node]
2. Mesos Worker or Agent
3. No
4. Carefully
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Sam Salisbury
wrote:
> Master/Minion +1
>
> On 5 June 2015 at 15:14, CCAAT wrote:
>
>>
>> "+1 master/slave, no change needed." is the same as
>> "master/slave"I.E. kee
Master/Minion +1
On 5 June 2015 at 15:14, CCAAT wrote:
>
> "+1 master/slave, no change needed." is the same as
> "master/slave"I.E. keep the nomenclature as it currently is
>
> This means keep the name 'master' and keep the name 'slave'.
>
>
> Are you applying fuzzy math or kalman filters t
"+1 master/slave, no change needed." is the same as
"master/slave"I.E. keep the nomenclature as it currently is
This means keep the name 'master' and keep the name 'slave'.
Are you applying fuzzy math or kalman filters to your summations below?
It looks to me, tallying things up, Master
Wow, what a response! Allow me to attempt to summarize the sentiment so far.
Let's start with the implicit question,
*0. Should we rename Mesos Slave?*
+1 (Explicit approval) 12, including 7 from JIRA
+0.5 (Implicit approval, suggested alternate name) 18
-0.5 (Some disapproval, wouldn't block it)
+1 for keeping master/slave.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Panyungao (Wingoal)
wrote:
> +1 master/slave.
>
>
>
> These are only terminologies in software architecture. They have
> different definitions from those of social or political view.
>
>
>
> *发件人:* zhou weitao [mailto:zhouwtl...@gm
+1 master/slave.
These are only terminologies in software architecture. They have different
definitions from those of social or political view.
发件人: zhou weitao [mailto:zhouwtl...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2015年6月5日 10:40
收件人: user@mesos.apache.org
主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming Mesos Slave
+1 master/slav
10 matches
Mail list logo
