Thanks Deepak. I will take a look.
Tom
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Deepak Dixit <
deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Please refer:
>
>
I can confirm this behaviour (working well and better with more instances to support the growing load) for a configuration of 5 OFBiz machines against
a cluster of 3 Postgres machines (using PgPool II).
It was also for an ecommerce application for a major Internet provider. I then I wrote the
Leonard,
We have clients using distributed cache -- we used ActiveMQ to synchronize any
cache modifications from one server to the other(s). Worked very well -- and we
saw a significant performance uptick when adding additional "slave" instances.
Our implementations are typically for
Hi,
I would like to ask if someone has already investigated or implemented an
adapter for OFBiz to use a central caching system like memcached, redis or the
like.
I know for OFBiz cluster setup there is the distributed cache clear mechanism.
I did use that in the past but have found that
Hi Jacopo
I agree and will make sure that it's included.
Thanks
Sharan
On 2016-06-27 11:18 (+0200), Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> Thanks, they were good to me.
> However I think we should use the name "Apache OFBiz" because this is the
> official name that
Thanks, they were good to me.
However I think we should use the name "Apache OFBiz" because this is the
official name that was registered.
Jacopo
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> Thank you all very much for your feedback. As it seems
Hi Everyone
Thank you all very much for your feedback. As it seems to have been a little
mixed, some liking the general idea and others not, I'll go back to Kenneth and
we'll see what other options we can come up with.
Thanks
Sharan
On 2016-06-23 17:16 (+0200), "Sharan