Just adding my support to the quest to simplify and/or clearly document
postgresql integration - from personal experience I completely agree with
Timothy’s mail below too! It is really unclear how postgres should be
integrated.
I am new to Ofbiz and am hoping to contribute development and doc
Maybe a short term solution would be to seed in a default facility, just like
there is the default _NA_ facility group. That would be a quicker fix I would
think, and suppress the issue until it can be fixed.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts
Damned this is so much a mess, really r734037should never has been in, let be
in and done that way :/
I don't want and can't easily clean all that today because now of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10087 (you can't delete a record, a
facility here)
So like last time I'll use a p
Yes this has been discussed (many times), here is the last take at it
http://markmail.org/message/tbn7mn753x27snn7
The right thing to do would be to revert or refactor r734037 but as I said in
OFBIZ-5321 not an easy task and not a priority
BTW the right link to use is facility/control/EditFaci
I have a docker image + docker-compose file which I've been using for
a while now. It hosts OFBiz + Postgres and it works great.
It's up to the community to decide if it is interested in moving from
the default derby to Postgres and to officially support Docker as the
default tool for deploying OF
Looks like there is already some working Docker images out on Docker Hub. None
so far suite my current needs (OFBiz with Docker MS SQL 2017 on Linux). I think
I may reach out to opensourceknight and see if he can extend his image to add
the volume /framework/entity/lib/jdbc, so that any JDBC dri
