Re: Debugging SOAP processing

No worries Jason, Indeed there was a quirk, you are subscribed as jason_of...@reast.net Sincerely let's forget it and if it reproduces we will see ;) Thanks for your feedback Jacques Le 28/01/2019 à 17:43, Jason RJ a écrit : Sorry Jacques, Not sure why this went through moderation, I am

Re: Debugging SOAP processing

Thanks Jason, Your message has been moderated. Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email client rather than the Nabble forum (as the forum says to you) See also why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html You will get a better support , it's more fair

Re: Debugging SOAP processing

Hi Greg, You could try adding additional logging in applications/party/minilang/contact/PartyContactMechServices.xml - within the section you can add a few log calls:                                            

Re: 答复: OFBIZ-2805 For Jacques

Great news, thank Ye Jacques Le 28/01/2019 à 13:09, Schumann Ye a écrit : Hi Jacques, You’ve been always helpful. After some case studies, I’ve kind of found out the root cause. It’s because of the safety mechanism of Chrome/Firefox/Edge except IE. The current codes work for IE but not the

RE: Debugging SOAP processing

Hi Jacques Excellent. I have my day job to attend to also! Regards, Greg Finlayson DipLaw GDLP(Merit) Australian Lawyer Diaspora Legal 10 Talbot Street Erindale SA 5066 T: +61 8 73250080 M:+61 4 3131 3073 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation This

Re: Debugging SOAP processing

Hi Greg, If nobody beats me on it I should be able to help you. Just that I have no time at the moment... Jacques Le 28/01/2019 à 14:56, Greg Finlayson a écrit : So I am trying to use findPartyFromEmailAddress SOAP service from a .NET   client. I know the username and password arguments

Debugging SOAP processing

So I am trying to use findPartyFromEmailAddress SOAP service from a .NET client. I know the username and password arguments are getting passed correctly, because if I change them to be incorrect, then I get errors. However I just get a http-nio-8443-exec-1 RequestHandler Ran Event soap:#

Re: BOM With Multiple Levels

Hi James, Have a look at [1] to get a feel of one production run being dependent another. You have to keep in mind that doing this in such a way (through invoking the 'Create Dependent Production Runs' on a new production run), you may work towards undesirable efficiency results on the preceding

答复: OFBIZ-2805 For Jacques

Hi Jacques, You’ve been always helpful. After some case studies, I’ve kind of found out the root cause. It’s because of the safety mechanism of Chrome/Firefox/Edge except IE. The current codes work for IE but not the previous main browsers because the system treats it calling maliciously since

RE: BOM With Multiple Levels

Thank you Pierre. In your example when you run a production run for HissVat-0002F33mE does it also create a production run for HissVat-0002B7? Original Message Subject: Re: BOM With Multiple Levels From: Pierre Smits Date: Mon, January 28, 2019 12:56 am To:

RE: BOM With Multiple Levels

Thank you. Where is the field located? Original Message Subject: Re: BOM With Multiple Levels From: Yashwant Dhakad Date: Sun, January 27, 2019 9:15 pm To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Hi James, Yes, It supported and while creating production run please select the *Create Dependent

Re: BOM With Multiple Levels

Are the intermediate products in your production run stockable items or do they move directly to the next production step? In that case, you could maybe define these items as phantom items and blow demand through them (in case Ofbiz offers this functionality). Like that you build-up your BOM as