:06 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI Mike, all,
>
> Re 2: Talk about adjustment of default key size
> Why is that absurd? You believe it is too long/too short?
> Following JIRA issue may be of interest:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFB
gt;>> build
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> database. The jira is interesting, and GUIDs are a good example.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Personally, I use postgresql, using the "localpostnew" type...
>>>>>>&g
>>>>>> accounting_OrganizationData.xml:>>>>>> roleTypeId="INTERNAL_ORGANIZATIO"/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The default of ID (20 chrs) is so small that you can't even properly
>>>>> spell
>>>>
yourself when you first
> >> build a
> >>>>> database. The jira is interesting, and GUIDs are a good example.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Personally, I use postgresql, using the "localpostnew" type...
> Removed
> >>>>> f
database. The jira is interesting, and GUIDs are a good example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally, I use postgresql, using the "localpostnew" type... Removed
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> trunk for some reason.. It has un
,
>>>>> which
>>>>> allows me to create any sort of primary key I want.
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>> java-type="String"/>
>>>>> >> java-type="String"/>
>>>>> >&g
>>>>> >>>>
>>>> java-type="String"/>
>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> java-type="String"/>
>>>
>>>> If you think that type=TEXT is slow or less efficient.. Here is what
&
ree because of its
additional
storage costs. In most situations text or character varying should be
used
instead.
Mysql has a similar type... I personally haven't tested it.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
HI Mike, all,
Re 2: Talk about adjus
, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:
HI Mike, all,
Re 2: Talk about adjustment of default key size
Why is that absurd? You believe it is too long/too short?
Following JIRA issue may be of interest:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8343
Best regar
in fact
>> character(n) is usually the slowest of the three because of its additional
>> storage costs. In most situations text or character varying should be used
>> instead.
>>
>> Mysql has a similar type... I personally haven't tested it.
>>
>>
e, all,
Re 2: Talk about adjustment of default key size
Why is that absurd? You believe it is too long/too short?
Following JIRA issue may be of interest:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8343
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions &am
, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > HI Mike, all,
> >
> > Re 2: Talk about adjustment of default key size
> > Why is that absurd? You believe it is too long/too short?
> > Followin
HI Mike, all,
Re 2: Talk about adjustment of default key size
Why is that absurd? You believe it is too long/too short?
Following JIRA issue may be of interest:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8343
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based sol
13 matches
Mail list logo