Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Great :)) So the only issue remain with plugin is recordings download I guess avi/flv download should be replaced with mp4 download :) -- WBR Maxim aka solomax

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Maxim, ok, I tested the setup with the OpenMeetings revision 1781378, moodle version 3.0.8 and the moodle om plugin release 2.0.2.0 (master branch right now) again. With FF 51, Chromium 55 and Opera 43 Beta on LinuxMint 18 I am able to login as OM admin and can see the dashboard and can

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

demo server [1] is updated with this build works as expected going to test locally with screen-sharing on Mac :) [1] https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > My steps were > > Download tar.gz > Unarchive > Run

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

My steps were Download tar.gz Unarchive Run red5-debug.sh Everything was working Oracle Java 1.8b121 Ubuntu 16.10 Later will try on Ubuntu 16.04 and will update demo server with this build WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Feb 3, 2017 10:05, "Jason"

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I can try again.  I treat it as a new install.  #465 worked for me.  Installed it a few times.  I downloaded the tar.gz snapshot not the zip. ⁣​ On Feb 2, 2017, 6:26 PM, at 6:26 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >Hello Jason, > >just have downloaded, unarchive, walk through

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Jason, just have downloaded, unarchive, walk through installation, everything is OK What were your steps? On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Jason wrote: > Current build #436 doesn't work. I tried to load the current build and it > throws this when trying to

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Build #435 from here https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.2.x/ Should work as expected On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Michael Wuttke wrote: > Ok, shoud I test Revision 1781378 now? > > Michael > > Am 02.02.2017 um 10:21 schrieb

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

right! m.w. Am 02.02.2017 um 09:28 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > So WB is not being loaded, > But no white screen anymore? > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Michael Wuttke > > wrote: > > Hi, > > I can test only the "OM

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

So WB is not being loaded, But no white screen anymore? On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Michael Wuttke wrote: > Hi, > > I can test only the "OM 3.2 Test Room" you gave me. > > I allways get the same error messeage with FF 51.0.1 under LinuxMint > 18.: "Error Missing

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Michael, Version, currently installed on demo server, seems to work for me as expected Chrome 56.0, FF 51.0, Ubuntu 16.04 FF version loads room much longer than FF :(( will try to check this Could you please check on your side? On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Maxim Solodovnik

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

OK, According to the testing using Moodle site on demo server, the issue is not fully fixed. Going to perform further investigation On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > please let me know if you need any additional permissions > I have no experience

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Michael, According to my tests this version: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.2.x/428/ Works much more stable, I see no errors or "blank pages" in my Moodle Could you please check on your server? On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Maxim Solodovnik

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I was able to get "white page" It is caused by failed WebSocket connection Maybe you have WebSockets disabled? Do you have any exceptions in OM logs? On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > There should be no dashboard if you accessing room from Moodle >

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

WebRTC is not yet supported, we are working on it :) On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:49 PM, john felipe urrego mejia wrote: > Openmeetings latest version have webrtc support? > > 2017-01-23 5:41 GMT-05:00 Peter Dähn : >> >> I had a look around... >> >> I

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Openmeetings latest version have webrtc support? 2017-01-23 5:41 GMT-05:00 Peter Dähn : > I had a look around... > > I found this one... > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many > > and the "simple solution can be peer-to-server model

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

There should be no dashboard if you accessing room from Moodle I would appreciate any steps or maybe hints on how to configure this and be able to reproduce On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Michael Wuttke wrote: > Hello, > > I've tested with FF and Chromium. And I

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello, I've tested with FF and Chromium. And I enabled the OM Site in the "Cookies settings". And reloaded the page. But like Peter described the OM dashboard is empty, just the general chat is available. Thanks & Greetings, Michael Am 31.01.2017 um 10:26 schrieb Peter Dähn: > Hello, > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello, probably this one? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1538 Greetings Peter Am 31.01.2017 um 10:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: Blank page is really weird ... Any JS/Cookies errors in the browser Before latest change version should be set in 2 places (build.xml and

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Blank page is really weird ... Any JS/Cookies errors in the browser Before latest change version should be set in 2 places (build.xml and version.php) I see no reason to have these 2 versions, they are the same On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Michael Wuttke wrote:

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Maxim, I tested now the latest master branch and it does not work with moodle 3.0.8 and OM 3.2 RC1. I've got a blank page as well. I can only see the general chat. And what speaks against to set the version string to the version.php directly? Thanks & Greetings, Michael Am 31.01.2017 um

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Michael, master branch works for me with Moodle 3.0.4 I have updated README with build instructions Could you please check? On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Michael Wuttke wrote: > Hello MAxim, > > thanks for your work, but the master branch does not work now

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello MAxim, thanks for your work, but the master branch does not work now with moodle 3.0 and OM 3.2. I've got a blank page and could only see the general chat. And please could you set the version string to the version.php for those how work only with github as code reposistory? Thanks &

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

iday, January 27, 2017 10:44 PM > To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org>; dev > <d...@openmeetings.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release > > Hello All, > > I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last minute" i

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Michael, I have updated plugin master branch is updated to work with OM 3.2 Additional branch 2.7.3.2 was created build was updated to automatically set version from build.xml to version.php (with release date) So now for these 2 branches version should be specified in one place only On

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Maxim, thanks for the Info. Greetings, Michael Am 30.01.2017 um 02:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > Hello Michael, > > plugin need to be updated > this line [1] should be modified as follows > -- $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/swf?=" . $hash > --. "=" . $openmeetings->om->room_id >

RE: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

ser@openmeetings.apache.org>; dev <d...@openmeetings.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release Hello All, I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last minute" issues? :))) Another question: Is it OK to drop 3.1.x support? i.e. 3.1.5 will be the last 3.1.x r

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Michael, plugin need to be updated this line [1] should be modified as follows -- $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/swf?=" . $hash --. "=" . $openmeetings->om->room_id --. "=" . $openmeetings->om->language; ++ $url = $gateway->getUrl() . "/hash?=" . $hash ++. "=" .

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Maxim, the upgrade works but the moodle om plugin not. It is possible to create a new room but not to enter a room. The om login page will be shown always. Thanks & Greetings, Michael Am 29.01.2017 um 17:00 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > Hello Michael, > > Sure you can upgrade, the upgrade

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Michael, Sure you can upgrade, the upgrade process is usual Backup everything Create db Restore Moodle plugin should work as expected WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Jan 29, 2017 22:21, "Michael Wuttke" wrote: Hello Maxim, two questions:

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Maxim, two questions: - can I upgrade from OM 3.1.x to 3.2.0 or I have to install a new/fresh OM installation? - does the moodle om plugin some improvements? Thanks & Greetings, Michael Am 29.01.2017 um 08:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > I'm going to start 3.2.0 release :)) > > On Sat,

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I'm going to start 3.2.0 release :)) On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last minute" issues? > :))) > > Another question: Is it OK to drop 3.1.x support? i.e. 3.1.5 will be the >

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello All, I'm almost ready to start 3.2.0 release process, Any "last minute" issues? :))) Another question: Is it OK to drop 3.1.x support? i.e. 3.1.5 will be the last 3.1.x release On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Thanks for the report

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Thanks for the report Sebastian! I was able to reproduce and fix this issue demo is updated please let me know if anything else is broken ... On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Thanks Sebastian, > I'll double-check > It was ok during my test, maybe

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Thanks Sebastian, I'll double-check It was ok during my test, maybe will ask for the steps WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Jan 24, 2017 04:02, "seba.wag...@gmail.com" wrote: Hi Maxim, good work! I have seen some improvements/simplifications on the

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hi Maxim, good work! I have seen some improvements/simplifications on the User-list. Less buttons. I think that is the right approach. Simpler user interface is better. But I noticed that a bit of work is required in the Audio/Video settings. It works initially, but if you try to refresh (via

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hi Dimitriy, node.js for server-side js is a huge package that need to handled somehow... I also don't know if this would be the best solution... webRTC browser2browser will not scale for private user and their dsl-connection. So webRTC or SIP/RTMP to a mediaserver that then multicasts to

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Peter, I'm working on webRTC native client that can accept peer connection from browser. We already have "serverlessmedia" solution "browser - to - browser" with our signal server in Java. We're moving to "*peer*-to-*media server*-to-*all other peers*" solution. >> Do you know this guy?

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I had a look around... I found this one... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20056683/webrtc-multicast-one-to-many and the "simple solution can be peer-to-server model (*peer*-to-*media server*-to-*all other peers*)." Do you know this guy? https://github.com/muaz-khan Greetings Peter Am

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hello Alvaro :) I guess this week I'll try to start 2 VOTEs :))) on both 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 releases :) I believe this is the only chance to move forward :) + It's not easy to maintain 3 branches of code :( On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > 1) yep,

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

1) yep, we do have WB prototype, but it requires lots of enhancements :( additionally there will be no huge flash area to put video windows so this need to be handled 2) we are working on prototype but unfortunately with no luck :( WebRTC requires native C++ building, and too muck tricky :(

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

...OM 3.2.0 release? ... On lun, 2017-01-23 at 11:29 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > If no critical issues will be reported, I plan to pack RC1 on > Wednesday > Thanks for participating :) > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I thought the same about the general roadmap 1st whiteborad (there was something in gsoc, right?) 2nd audio/video (also gsoc but not finally prototyped) Lets have a look, if we could get some input (and feedback!) from such whish-list... Am 23.01.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: Wish

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Wish list is good idea :) I guess it can be created from the list of JIRA issues, then discussed :) My plans were to perform next steps to remove Flash :), 1) move WB to HTML5 2) move Audio/Video ... last one seems to be tricky :( no POC yet :( On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Peter Dähn

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

nothing critical, rooms are working so far... We will collect a few things regarding usability and look and feel. Unfortunatly by now no time is left... I think we will report this using Jira... btw.. Is there a kind of wish-list to discuss new features/wishes and probably get a ranking of

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Right might be the better place... Go for it! Am 21.01.2017 um 04:48 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: Or maybe even better to correct http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html (Configuration -> User Interface -> Themes) And add section On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxim

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Would be fine for me! Am 20.01.2017 um 17:56 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: I can add the page to http://openmeetings.apache.org/ Configuration -> Customization -> Styling What do you think would it be OK? On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Peter Dähn > wrote:

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

If no critical issues will be reported, I plan to pack RC1 on Wednesday Thanks for participating :) On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Or maybe even better to correct http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and- > branding.html (Configuration -> User

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Or maybe even better to correct http://openmeetings.apache.org/themes-and-branding.html (Configuration -> User Interface -> Themes) And add section On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > I can add the page to > http://openmeetings.apache.org/ > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I can add the page to http://openmeetings.apache.org/ Configuration -> Customization -> Styling What do you think would it be OK? On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Peter Dähn wrote: > ok... is this Info somewhere? Maybe it is enough to write it down in the > documentation... > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

ok... is this Info somewhere? Maybe it is enough to write it down in the documentation... Am 20.01.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: To provide custom styling/layout you can modify existing css files I can create empty "custom.css" and will add it to be included last, but I see not

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

o:* Openmeetings user-list > *Sub**ject:* Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release > > > > The problem is in file limit on our server, try smaller mp4 file :))) > > We will increase the limit to be at least 20M > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

To provide custom styling/layout you can modify existing css files I can create empty "custom.css" and will add it to be included last, but I see not much sense in it and you can do it as follows: 1) create webapps/openmeetings/css/custom.css file 2) open

RE: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

OK with MP4. Uploaded and played. J From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 12:19 PM To: Openmeetings user-list Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release The problem is in file limit on our server, try smaller mp4 file :))) We will increase

RE: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

I tried to upload two files 12 and 15 MB. Both are not uploaded. Process of loading hanged. From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 12:19 PM To: Openmeetings user-list Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release The problem is in file limit on our

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

one more thing: is it possible to provide a custom.css file to provide custom layout somehow? Am 19.01.2017 um 06:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: Hello All, I believe 3.2.0 should be released, I'm going to implement https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1527 and would like to pack

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

>> >> Nik >> >> >> >> *From:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:20 PM >> *To:* dev; Openmeetings user-list >> *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release >> >> >> >> Video

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

MP4-format supported ? > > > > Nik > > > > *From:* Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:20 PM > *To:* dev; Openmeetings user-list > *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release > > > > Video upload and file del

RE: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hi Maxim, FLV,AVI-files are OK. MP4 ones are not uploaded. Is MP4-format supported ? Nik From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:20 PM To: dev; Openmeetings user-list Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release Video upload and file

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Video upload and file deletion in room are fixed Please let me know if any other issues blocks the release :) On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Stupid idea > Maybe JS is disabled in your Chrome? > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Peter Dähn

Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Already working on this :) Thanks for the report! On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Yakovlev N. wrote: > Hi, Maxim. > > There are some errors with OM3.2: > > 1. While uploading flv- and avi-files (The have been errors while > processing the file) in a conference

RE: [DISCUSSION] 3.2.0 release

Hi, Maxim. There are some errors with OM3.2: 1. While uploading flv- and avi-files (The have been errors while processing the file) in a conference room. 2. Its’s not possible to play these flv- and avi-files 3. It’s not possible do delete the uploaded files from My files