AH! Now I get it...I am running on a pretty beefy cluster...I would have
thought this would work, even if a bit slower. Do you know which timeout
settings I would need to alter to get this to work?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Maryann Xue wrote:
> Yes, I know. That
With your query as it stands, you're trying to construct 250K*270M pairs
before filtering them. That's 67.5 trillion. You will need a quantum
computer.
I think you will be better off restructuring...
James
On 11 Sep 2015 5:34 pm, "M. Aaron Bossert" wrote:
> AH! Now I get
I just tried to create an index on a column for a table with 200M rows.
Creating the index timed out:
0: jdbc:phoenix:172.31.31.143> CREATE INDEX idx_lastname ON loadtest.testing
(lastname);
Error: Operation timed out (state=TIM01,code=6000)
java.sql.SQLTimeoutException: Operation
The first step I think is a repo with code that compiles. Please initialize it
by forking github.com/apache/phoenix so we have common ancestors. Once we have
a clear idea (by diff) what is required we can figure out if we can support
compatibility in some way.
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:00 PM,
The group IDs and versions can be parameterized in the POM so they can be
overridden on the maven command line with -D. That would be easy and something
I think we could get committed without any controversy.
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 6:53 AM, James Heather wrote:
>
Don't have a quantum computer...but am on a small supercomputer ;). 1500 cores,
6TB of memory, 40TB of SSD, and a few hundred TB of spinning disks...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 1:23 PM, James Heather wrote:
>
> With your query as it stands, you're
Hi James,
You can drop the partially created index and try following steps
1) Add the following property to hbase-site.xml at phoenix client side.
phoenix.query.timeoutMs
double of default value
2) Export the HBASE_CONF_PATH with the configuration directory where
hbase-site.xml present.
3)
Hi!
I create two tables:
CREATE TABLE "Customers2" ("CustomerID" VARCHAR NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
"C"."CustomerName" VARCHAR,
"C"."Country" VARCHAR
)
and
CREATE TABLE "Orders2" ("OrderID" VARCHAR NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
"O"."CustomerID" VARCHAR,
"O"."Date" VARCHAR,
"O"."ItemID"
James,
It should be in building state. Can you check what's the state of it?
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:04 PM, James Heather
wrote:
> Hi Rajeshbabu,
>
> Thanks--yes--I've done that. I'm now recreating the index with a long
> timeout.
>
> I
Ah, too late, I'm afraid. I dropped it.
James
On 11/09/15 11:41, rajeshb...@apache.org wrote:
James,
It should be in building state. Can you check what's the state of it?
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:04 PM, James Heather
Hi Rajeshbabu,
Thanks--yes--I've done that. I'm now recreating the index with a long
timeout.
I reported it because it seemed to me to be a bug: Phoenix thinks that
the index is there, but it's not. It ought to get cleaned up after a
timeout.
James
On 11/09/15 11:32,
1400 mappers on 9 nodes is about 155 mappers per datanode which sounds high
to me. There are very few specifics in your mail. Are you using YARN? Can
you provide details like table structure, # of rows & columns, etc. Do you
have an error stack?
On Friday, September 11, 2015, Gaurav Kanade
Hi Alberto,
Could you please check in your server log if there's an ERROR, probably
something like InsufficientMemoryException?
Thanks,
Maryann
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Alberto Gonzalez Mesas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I create two tables:
>
> CREATE TABLE "Customers2"
Hi Aaron,
As Jaime pointed out, it is a non-equi join. And unfortunately it is
handled as CROSS join in Phoenix and thus is not very efficient. For each
row from the left side, it will be joined with all of the rows from the
right side before the condition is a applied to filter the joined
14 matches
Mail list logo