Re: Is it possible to do a dynamic deploy of a newer version of Phoenix coprocessor to specific tables?

2019-01-22 Thread Owen Rees-Hayward
Thanks for the clarification Josh. On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, 15:53 Josh Elser I was referring to the JDBC (thick) client and the coprocessors inside > HBase. The thin JDBC client does not talk to HBase directly, only to PQS. > > PQS and the thin-client would actually be the exception to what I said >

Re: Is it possible to do a dynamic deploy of a newer version of Phoenix coprocessor to specific tables?

2019-01-22 Thread Josh Elser
I was referring to the JDBC (thick) client and the coprocessors inside HBase. The thin JDBC client does not talk to HBase directly, only to PQS. PQS and the thin-client would actually be the exception to what I said in my last message. You could (with a high degree of confidence) deploy a new

Re: Is it possible to do a dynamic deploy of a newer version of Phoenix coprocessor to specific tables?

2019-01-22 Thread Owen Rees-Hayward
Hey Josh, thanks for your thoughts. Based on your advice we will almost certainly not pursue this direction. But just to clarify, in terms of the client version are you referring to the Query server, JDBC clients or both? I imagine from the JDBC perspective that a client would only be accessing