Hi Team,
I would like to store ROW_TIMESTAMP as TIMESTAMP in nanoseconds, what is
the best way to generate Timestamp with nanoseconds and when I query using
ROW_TIMESTAMP stored in nanoseconds do I loose the precision to
milliseconds.
Thanks
Another option is to upgrade to 4.8 or later and use transactions (which
uses optimistic concurrency under the covers):
https://phoenix.apache.org/transactions.html
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:53 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Upgrade to 4.9 or later and use our
Upgrade to 4.9 or later and use our atomic upsert command:
http://phoenix.apache.org/atomic_upsert.html
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:38 AM Pradheep Shanmugam <
pradheep.shanmu...@infor.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> we have a table in phoenix 4.4 which has a modifyrevision as a column..
>
> when a thread
hi,
we have a table in phoenix 4.4 which has a modifyrevision as a column..
when a thread updates the row the modifyrevision has to be incremented..
only option i can see is to use the upsert select to get the latest revision
but since it is not atomic how do we avoid the dirty reads?is there
Hello folks,
I'm facing the issue of disabling adding to the block cache records I'm
selecting from my Spark application when reading as DataFrame (e.g.
sqlContext.phoenixTableAsDataFrame(myTable, myColumns, myPredicate,
myZkUrl, myConf).
I know I can force the no cache on a query basis