store ROW_TIMESTAMP as TIMESTAMP in nanoseconds

2017-08-30 Thread Adi Kadimetla
Hi Team, I would like to store ROW_TIMESTAMP as TIMESTAMP in nanoseconds, what is the best way to generate Timestamp with nanoseconds and when I query using ROW_TIMESTAMP stored in nanoseconds do I loose the precision to milliseconds. Thanks

Re: optimistic lock in phenix

2017-08-30 Thread James Taylor
Another option is to upgrade to 4.8 or later and use transactions (which uses optimistic concurrency under the covers): https://phoenix.apache.org/transactions.html Thanks, James On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:53 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Upgrade to 4.9 or later and use our

Re: optimistic lock in phenix

2017-08-30 Thread James Taylor
Upgrade to 4.9 or later and use our atomic upsert command: http://phoenix.apache.org/atomic_upsert.html On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:38 AM Pradheep Shanmugam < pradheep.shanmu...@infor.com> wrote: > hi, > > > we have a table in phoenix 4.4 which has a modifyrevision as a column.. > > when a thread

optimistic lock in phenix

2017-08-30 Thread Pradheep Shanmugam
hi, we have a table in phoenix 4.4 which has a modifyrevision as a column.. when a thread updates the row the modifyrevision has to be incremented.. only option i can see is to use the upsert select to get the latest revision but since it is not atomic how do we avoid the dirty reads?is there

Use Phoenix hints with Spark Integration [main use case: block cache disable]

2017-08-30 Thread Roberto Coluccio
Hello folks, I'm facing the issue of disabling adding to the block cache records I'm selecting from my Spark application when reading as DataFrame (e.g. sqlContext.phoenixTableAsDataFrame(myTable, myColumns, myPredicate, myZkUrl, myConf). I know I can force the no cache on a query basis