Re: Phoenix executeBatch

Writing to HDFS with a columnar format like Parquet will always be faster than writing to HBase. How about random access of a row? If you're not doing point lookups and small range scans, you probably don't want to use HBase (& Phoenix). HBase is writing more information than is written when using

Re: Phoenix executeBatch

Any answer on this..? On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote: > Hi to all, > looking at the documentation (https://phoenix.apache.org/tuning_guide.html), > in the writing section, there's the following sentence: "Phoenix uses > commit() instead of

Phoenix executeBatch

Hi to all, looking at the documentation (https://phoenix.apache.org/tuning_guide.html), in the writing section, there's the following sentence: "Phoenix uses commit() instead of executeBatch() to control batch updates". Am using a Phoenix connection with autocommit enabled +