yes
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead?
___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
yes
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nlwrote:
yes
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead?
___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
* Ceki Gulcu wrote, On 27/03/09 04:16:
Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list.
+1
davidv
___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
yes
Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch wrote:
Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead?
___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
On 26.03.2009, at 18:16, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead? If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list.
+1!
I'd also like to mention the following Sun program:
http://www.sun.com/software/javaseforbusiness/
Joern Huxhorn skrev:
The following link contains a news story about SAP paying Sun big time
to keep supporting Java 1.4.x for their customers. Unfortunately, it's
in german and I couldn't find that info in English:
