x
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-column-families-vs-Multiple-tables-tp12425p12439.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
bq. does not do well with anything above two or three column families
Current hbase releases, such as 0.98.x, would do better than the above.
5 column families should be accommodated.
Cheers
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> We are doing schema design for our application, One
1431095941/BeL90zozx
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-column-families-vs-Multiple-tables-tp12425p12439.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at
We are doing schema design for our application, One thing we are not so
clear about is multiple column families (more than 3, probably 5 - 8) vs
multiple tables. In our use case, we will have the same number of rows in
all these column families, but some column families may be modified more
often t
