--
> From: Jacek Laskowski [mailto:ja...@japila.pl]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 10:46 AM
> To: Mendelson, Assaf
> Cc: user
> Subject: Re: using an alternative slf4j implementation
>
> Hi,
>
> Sounds like a quite involved development for me. I can't help here.
&
ay of forcing logback as the binding?
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Laskowski [mailto:ja...@japila.pl]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 10:46 AM
To: Mendelson, Assaf
Cc: user
Subject: Re: using an alternative slf4j implementation
Hi,
Sounds like a quite involved development for me. I
logs to log4j and my logs
> to logback or send everything to logback.
>
> Assaf.
>
>
>
> From: Jacek Laskowski [mailto:ja...@japila.pl]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 12:47 AM
> To: Mendelson, Assaf
> Cc: user
> Subject: Re: using an alternative slf4j imp
spark’s logs to log4j and my logs to
logback or send everything to logback.
Assaf.
From: Jacek Laskowski [mailto:ja...@japila.pl]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 12:47 AM
To: Mendelson, Assaf
Cc: user
Subject: Re: using an alternative slf4j implementation
Hi,
Shading conflicting dependencies
Hi,
Shading conflicting dependencies?
Jacek
On 5 Feb 2017 3:56 p.m., "Mendelson, Assaf" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Spark seems to explicitly use log4j.
>
> This means that if I use an alternative backend for my application (e.g.
> ch.qos.logback) I have a conflict.
>
> Sure I can exclude logback but tha