ems union should work for this scenario
>
> in part C, try to use: output_a union output_b
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Spark-execution-plan-tp10482p10491.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
it seems union should work for this scenario
in part C, try to use: output_a union output_b
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Spark-execution-plan-tp10482p10491.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
I was wondering how spark may deal with an execution plan. Using PIG as
example and its DAG execution, I would like to manage Spark for a similar
solution.
For instance, if my code has 3 different "parts", being A and B
self-sufficient parts:
Part A:
..
.
.
var output_a
Part
